We put the Apple iPhone 14 Plus through our rigorous DXOMARK Audio test suite to measure its performance both at recording sound using its built-in microphones, and at playing audio back through its speakers.
In this review, we will break down how it fared in a variety of tests and several common use cases.
Overview
Key audio specifications include:
- Top front, front facing, bottom right, side facing
- No jack audio output
- Dolby Atmos technology
- Spatial Audio playback
Scoring
Sub-scores and attributes included in the calculations of the global score.
Apple iPhone 14 Plus
141
audio
141
Black Shark 5 Pro
Best: Black Shark 5 Pro (158)
138
Black Shark 5 Pro
Best: Black Shark 5 Pro (149)
148
Black Shark 5 Pro
Best: Black Shark 5 Pro (162)
144
Black Shark 5 Pro
Best: Black Shark 5 Pro (162)
91
Asus ROG Phone 5
Best: Asus ROG Phone 5 (157)
130
Honor Magic3 Pro+
Best: Honor Magic3 Pro+ (147)
124
Black Shark 5 Pro
Best: Black Shark 5 Pro (146)
107
Vivo X Fold
Best: Vivo X Fold (159)
126
Black Shark 5 Pro
Best: Black Shark 5 Pro (170)
137
Black Shark 5 Pro
Best: Black Shark 5 Pro (145)
146
Black Shark 5 Pro
Best: Black Shark 5 Pro (166)
Position in Global Ranking

13
th
4. Asus Smartphone for Snapdragon Insiders
149
11. Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
142
15. Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
140
18. Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
139
18. Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra (Snapdragon)
139
25. Samsung Galaxy S23 Plus (Snapdragon)
137
32. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4
134
34. Samsung Galaxy S23 (Snapdragon)
133
34. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Snapdragon)
133
34. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos)
133
34. Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
133
46. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4
130
47. Vivo X80 Pro (Snapdragon)
129
50. Xiaomi Redmi K50 Gaming
128
55. Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
127
55. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
127
58. Samsung Galaxy A53 5G
126
63. Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
125
63. Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
125
63. Vivo X80 Pro (MediaTek)
125
66. Lenovo Legion Phone 2 Pro
124
69. Apple iPhone SE (2022)
122
69. Apple iPhone SE (2020)
122
72. Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Exynos)
121
76. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
120
76. Samsung Galaxy S22 (Snapdragon)
120
76. Samsung Galaxy S22 (Exynos)
120
79. Xiaomi Redmi K40 Gaming
119
85. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Snapdragon)
118
85. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Exynos)
118
85. Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G (Snapdragon)
118
85. Samsung Galaxy S21 5G (Snapdragon)
118
85. Samsung Galaxy S21 5G (Exynos)
118
96. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G (Exynos)
116
96. Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra 5G (Exynos)
116
96. Xiaomi Redmi K40 Pro+
116
102. Motorola Edge 30 Pro
115
102. Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra 5G (Snapdragon)
115
106. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold2 5G
114
108. Samsung Galaxy Note 10+ 5G (Exynos)
113
108. Samsung Galaxy Note 10+ (Exynos)
113
116. Nubia RedMagic 6 Pro
112
122. Huawei Mate 30 Pro 5G
109
129. Oppo Reno6 Pro 5G (Snapdragon)
108
136. Lenovo Legion Phone Pro
105
136. Nubia RedMagic 7 Pro
105
136. Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
105
145. Motorola Edge 20 Pro
102
149. Xiaomi Mi CC9 Pro Premium Edition
97
157. Vivo X70 Pro (MediaTek)
93
162. Vivo X60 Pro 5G (Snapdragon)
86
Position in Ultra-Premium Ranking

8
th
2. Asus Smartphone for Snapdragon Insiders
149
6. Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
142
9. Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
140
11. Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
139
11. Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra (Snapdragon)
139
16. Samsung Galaxy S23 Plus (Snapdragon)
137
20. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4
134
21. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Snapdragon)
133
21. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos)
133
30. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4
130
31. Vivo X80 Pro (Snapdragon)
129
35. Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
125
35. Vivo X80 Pro (MediaTek)
125
37. Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Exynos)
121
41. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
120
45. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Snapdragon)
118
45. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Exynos)
118
49. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G (Exynos)
116
49. Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra 5G (Exynos)
116
52. Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra 5G (Snapdragon)
115
53. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold2 5G
114
54. Samsung Galaxy Note 10+ 5G (Exynos)
113
54. Samsung Galaxy Note 10+ (Exynos)
113
61. Huawei Mate 30 Pro 5G
109
65. Lenovo Legion Phone Pro
105
Playback
Pros
- Good performance in all attributes, with great consistency across them
- Great timbre performance overall, enriched by a deep low-end extension
- Great dynamics performance overall
- Very good spatial performance
Cons
- Distortion and compression at maximum volume and when watching movies
- Stereo is still inverted in music app, as in all iPhones
Recording
Pros
- Good timbre performance overall
- Good performance when recording loud content such as concerts
- Good dynamics performance
- Good handling of artifacts overall. Wind noise reduction needs some fine-tuning but it works decently
Cons
- Midrange rendition is too dependent on the use case, and can sound either canny or nasal depending on the app and use case
- SNR could be greater, as main vocal content is often a bit masked by the ambient noise
- Poor audio zoom performance
The differences between the iPhone models when it comes to audio playback and recording have usually been minimal. The same holds true now with the release of the iPhone 14 series.
The iPhone 14 Plus, which contains the A15 Bionic chipset, shares many of the hardware specs as the iPhone 14-series models, except that the 14 Pro, and 14 Pro Max both operate on the latest A16 Bionic chip.
In Playback and Recording, the iPhone 14 Plus’s audio performance was identical in all categories to the iPhone 14.
Given all the similarities among the iPhone 14-series models and that the iPhone 14 Plus’s overall Audio score was just a point below the 14 Pro Max’s score, well within our margin of error, we direct you to the full test results of the iPhone 14 Pro Max.
DXOMARK invites our readership (you) to post comments on the articles on this website. Read more about our Comment Policy.