Smartphone review – DXOMARK

Oppo A78 5G Battery test

DXOMARK — Wed, 22 Mar 2023 14:26:29 +0000

We put the Oppo A78 5G through our rigorous DXOMARK Battery test suite to measure its performance in autonomy, charging and efficiency. In these test results, we will break down how it fared in a variety of tests and several common use cases.

Overview

Key specifications:

Battery capacity: 5000 mAh
33W charger (included)
6.56-inch, 720 x 1612, 90 Hz, LCD display
MediaTek Dimensity 700 (7 nm)
Tested ROM / RAM combination: 128 GB + 4 GB

Scoring

Sub-scores and attributes included in the calculations of the global score.

Oppo A78 5G

132

battery

147
autonomy

Home/Office

160

213

On the go

162

195

Calibrated

124

198

115
charging

Full charge

103

184

Quick boost

128

182

124
efficiency

Charge up

127

205

Discharge

122

194

Key performances

2 days 22h

Battery life

0h49

80% Charging time

1h34

Full charging time

4h29 autonomy

after 5-minute charge

Position in Global Ranking

27^th

1. Honor Magic5 Lite 5G

152

2. Honor X7a

147

3. Oppo Reno6 5G

146

4. Realme GT Neo 2 5G

144

5. Honor X9a

143

6. Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra (Snapdragon)

142

7. Oppo Reno8 5G

141

8. Asus ROG Phone 6

140

9. Oppo Reno8 Lite 5G

139

10. Oppo A77 5G

138

10. Sony Xperia 10 IV

138

12. Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max

136

12. OnePlus Nord CE 5G

136

12. Samsung Galaxy M51

136

12. Vivo Y72 5G

136

12. Vivo X80 Lite 5G

136

12. Xiaomi 11T

136

18. Honor Magic4 Lite 5G

135

18. Oppo Find X5 Lite

135

20. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G

134

20. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10

134

22. Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max

133

22. Oppo A74

133

22. Vivo Y76 5G

133

22. Vivo X60 Pro 5G (Snapdragon)

133

22. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S 5G

133

27. Honor X8 5G

132

27. Oppo A78 5G

132

27. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S

132

30. Samsung Galaxy A72

131

30. Wiko Power U30

131

32. Oppo Reno6 Pro 5G (Snapdragon)

130

33. Realme GT Neo 3

129

33. Samsung Galaxy A34 5G

129

33. Samsung Galaxy A23 5G

129

33. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro

129

37. Apple iPhone 14 Plus

128

37. OnePlus Nord 2 5G

128

37. Xiaomi 13

128

40. Nubia RedMagic 6 Pro

127

40. Oppo A94 5G

127

42. Honor 70

126

42. OnePlus 10T 5G

126

42. Oppo Find X3 Neo

126

42. Xiaomi 13 Pro

126

42. Xiaomi 11T Pro

126

47. Samsung Galaxy A13 5G

125

48. Huawei P50 Pro

123

48. Xiaomi 12T Pro

123

50. OnePlus 9

122

51. Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max

121

51. Oppo A74 5G

121

53. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G

120

54. Apple iPhone 14 Pro

119

54. Nothing Phone(1)

119

54. Oppo A54 5G

119

54. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11

119

58. Apple iPhone 13 Pro

118

58. Motorola Edge 20 Pro

118

58. Nubia RedMagic 7 Pro

118

58. Xiaomi 12T

118

58. Xiaomi 12 Lite 5G

118

63. Realme GT 2 Pro

117

64. Honor X7

116

64. Oppo Find X5 Pro

116

64. Vivo Y20s

116

67. Apple iPhone 13

115

67. Oppo Reno8 Pro 5G

115

67. Realme GT 5G

115

70. Huawei P40 Lite

114

70. Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro 5G

114

72. Samsung Galaxy A54 5G

113

72. Sony Xperia 5 IV

113

74. Apple iPhone 14

112

74. Motorola Moto G62 5G

112

74. OnePlus Nord 2T 5G

112

74. OnePlus 8T

112

78. Motorola Moto G9 Power

111

78. Oppo Find X5

111

78. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Snapdragon)

111

81. Wiko Power U20

110

82. Oppo Find X3 Lite

109

83. Samsung Galaxy S21 5G (Snapdragon)

108

83. Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra

108

85. Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G

107

86. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G

106

87. Black Shark 5 Pro

105

87. Oppo Find X3 Pro

105

89. OnePlus 9 Pro

104

90. Huawei Mate 50 Pro

103

90. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Snapdragon)

103

92. Asus Zenfone 8 Flip

102

92. Asus Zenfone 8

102

92. Google Pixel 7 Pro

102

95. OnePlus 10 Pro

100

95. POCO F4 GT

100

95. Samsung Galaxy S21 5G (Exynos)

100

95. Xiaomi Redmi 10 2022

100

95. Xiaomi 12

100

100. Apple iPhone 13 mini

100. Realme C21

100. Realme C11

100. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4

100. Vivo X80 Pro (Snapdragon)

105. Google Pixel 7

105. Motorola Edge 30 Pro

105. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos)

108. Google Pixel 6

109. Samsung Galaxy A33 5G

109. Vivo X51 5G

111. Honor Magic4 Pro

111. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4

111. Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Exynos)

111. Samsung Galaxy A53 5G

115. Google Pixel 6a

116. Apple iPhone 12 mini

116. Google Pixel 5

116. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Exynos)

119. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G

120. Samsung Galaxy S22 (Snapdragon)

121. Xiaomi Redmi 9

122. Sony Xperia 1 IV

123. Apple iPhone SE (2022)

124. Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G (Snapdragon)

124. Xiaomi Mi 11

126. Google Pixel 6 Pro

127. Xiaomi 12 Pro

128. Samsung Galaxy S22 (Exynos)

Position in Advanced Ranking

13^th

1. Honor Magic5 Lite 5G

152

2. Honor X7a

147

3. Honor X9a

143

4. Oppo A77 5G

138

5. OnePlus Nord CE 5G

136

5. Samsung Galaxy M51

136

5. Vivo Y72 5G

136

8. Honor Magic4 Lite 5G

135

9. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G

134

10. Oppo A74

133

10. Vivo Y76 5G

133

10. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S 5G

133

13. Honor X8 5G

132

13. Oppo A78 5G

132

15. Realme GT Neo 3

129

15. Samsung Galaxy A34 5G

129

15. Samsung Galaxy A23 5G

129

15. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro

129

19. OnePlus Nord 2 5G

128

20. Oppo A94 5G

127

21. Samsung Galaxy A13 5G

125

22. Oppo A74 5G

121

23. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G

120

24. Oppo A54 5G

119

25. Honor X7

116

26. Huawei P40 Lite

114

27. Motorola Moto G62 5G

112

27. OnePlus Nord 2T 5G

112

29. Motorola Moto G9 Power

111

30. Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G

107

31. Samsung Galaxy A33 5G

Pros

Very good autonomy, with almost 3 days of autonomy when used moderately
Excellent autonomy on the go
Low discharge current in almost all use cases

Cons

Longer-than-average charging time
Inaccurate battery gauge: 93% actual measured capacity shown as 100% on the display
High discharge current when watching videos

The Oppo A78 5G battery provided excellent autonomy when tested in factory default mode. The device’s charge lasted almost three days when used moderately, and on-the-go performance was excellent. When testing usage separately, autonomy was closer to the average.
The device showed good results when streaming videos in 4G and during idle time. However, autonomy when calling or listening to music was only average, compared with the excellent results when tested in factory default mode.

Charging the battery to full capacity took 1 hour and 34 minutes, which was slightly longer than average. A quick 5-minute charge provided 4.5 hours of autonomy, only 10 minutes more than our database average. Moreover, when the device indicated 100% of battery level, the real battery capacity was closer to 93%, which could impact the user experience.

The charger efficiency tipped to just below our database average, but the adapter efficiency was a bit above average. The residual consumption of the charger was average, too. Discharge currents were low during our typical usage scenario and when streaming videos in 4G, meaning that the device is well-optimized for these use cases. However, the discharge currents when gaming or watching videos in Wi-Fi or airplane mode were higher than average.

Compared with devices from the same range price ($200 – $399), the Oppo A78 5G ranked above average in our database. It showed excellent autonomy in factory default mode, but the charging and efficiency scores were just below average.

Test Summary

About DXOMARK Battery tests: For scoring and analysis in our smartphone battery reviews, DXOMARK engineers perform a variety of objective tests over a week-long period both indoors and outdoors. (See our introductory and how we test articles for more details about our smartphone Battery protocol.)

The following section gathers key elements of our exhaustive tests and analyses performed in DXOMARK laboratories. Detailed performance evaluations under the form of reports are available upon request. Do not hesitate to contact us.

	Battery	Charger	Wireless	Display	Processor
Oppo A78 5G	5000mAh	33W (included)	-	LCD 720 x 1612	Mediatek Dimensity 700
Oppo A77 5G	5000mAh	33W (not included)	-	LCD 720 x 1612	MediaTek Dimensity 810
Honor X7a	6000mAh	23W (included)	-	LCD 720 x 1600	Mediatek Helio G37

Autonomy

147

Oppo A78 5G

188

Honor X7a

How Autonomy score is composed

Autonomy score is composed of three performance sub-scores: Home / Office, On the go, and Calibrated use cases. Each sub-score comprises the results of a comprehensive range of tests for measuring autonomy in all kinds of real-life scenarios.

Learn more about how we test battery

100h

Light Usage

Active: 2h30/day

70h

Moderate Usage

Active: 4h/day

43h

Intense Usage

Active: 7h/day

Position in Global Ranking
Battery Life (moderate)

14^th

1. Honor X7a

86h

2. Vivo Y72 5G

85h

3. Wiko Power U30

80h

4. Sony Xperia 10 IV

80h

5. Oppo A77 5G

76h

6. Honor X8 5G

74h

7. Honor Magic5 Lite 5G

74h

8. Samsung Galaxy M51

73h

9. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S 5G

72h

10. Asus ROG Phone 6

72h

11. Honor X9a

72h

12. Wiko Power U20

71h

13. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G

70h

14. Oppo A78 5G

70h

15. Vivo Y20s

69h

16. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10

69h

17. Samsung Galaxy A13 5G

69h

18. Samsung Galaxy A72

69h

19. Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max

68h

20. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro

67h

21. Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra (Snapdragon)

67h

22. Oppo Reno8 Lite 5G

66h

23. Motorola Moto G62 5G

65h

24. Honor X7

65h

25. Samsung Galaxy A34 5G

65h

26. Oppo A54 5G

65h

27. Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max

65h

28. Samsung Galaxy A23 5G

64h

29. OnePlus Nord CE 5G

64h

30. Vivo Y76 5G

64h

31. Oppo A74

64h

32. Motorola Moto G9 Power

64h

33. Oppo A74 5G

63h

34. Apple iPhone 14 Plus

63h

35. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G

62h

36. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S

61h

37. Honor Magic4 Lite 5G

61h

38. Samsung Galaxy A54 5G

60h

39. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11

60h

40. Xiaomi 13 Pro

60h

41. Realme GT Neo 2 5G

60h

42. Xiaomi 11T

59h

43. Vivo X80 Lite 5G

59h

44. Realme C11

59h

45. Honor 70

58h

46. Oppo Find X5 Lite

58h

47. Oppo A94 5G

58h

48. Oppo Reno8 5G

58h

49. Realme C21

57h

50. Oppo Reno6 5G

57h

51. Sony Xperia 5 IV

57h

52. Xiaomi Redmi 10 2022

57h

53. Xiaomi 11T Pro

57h

54. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G

56h

55. OnePlus 10T 5G

55h

56. OnePlus Nord 2 5G

54h

57. Nothing Phone(1)

54h

58. OnePlus 9

54h

59. Xiaomi 13

54h

60. Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G

54h

61. Apple iPhone 14 Pro

54h

62. Xiaomi 12T Pro

54h

63. Apple iPhone 13 Pro

53h

64. Xiaomi 12 Lite 5G

53h

65. Nubia RedMagic 7 Pro

53h

66. Apple iPhone 14

53h

67. Apple iPhone 13

52h

68. Motorola Edge 20 Pro

52h

69. OnePlus Nord 2T 5G

52h

70. Realme GT Neo 3

52h

71. Xiaomi 12T

52h

72. Google Pixel 7 Pro

52h

73. Realme GT 5G

52h

74. Huawei P50 Pro

51h

75. Oppo Find X3 Neo

51h

76. Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro 5G

51h

77. Vivo X60 Pro 5G (Snapdragon)

51h

78. Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra

50h

79. Google Pixel 6a

50h

80. Huawei P40 Lite

50h

81. Realme GT 2 Pro

50h

82. Xiaomi Redmi 9

50h

83. Samsung Galaxy S21 5G (Snapdragon)

50h

84. Samsung Galaxy A53 5G

49h

85. Asus Zenfone 8 Flip

49h

86. Oppo Find X5 Pro

49h

87. Oppo Reno8 Pro 5G

49h

88. Google Pixel 7

49h

89. Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max

49h

90. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4

49h

91. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Snapdragon)

48h

92. Google Pixel 6

48h

93. Oppo Reno6 Pro 5G (Snapdragon)

48h

94. Oppo Find X5

48h

95. Motorola Edge 30 Pro

47h

96. Samsung Galaxy A33 5G

47h

97. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Snapdragon)

47h

98. Sony Xperia 1 IV

47h

99. Samsung Galaxy S21 5G (Exynos)

46h

100. Oppo Find X3 Lite

46h

101. Nubia RedMagic 6 Pro

46h

102. Xiaomi 12

45h

103. OnePlus 8T

45h

104. Asus Zenfone 8

45h

105. Google Pixel 5

44h

106. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos)

44h

107. Oppo Find X3 Pro

44h

108. OnePlus 10 Pro

43h

109. Vivo X80 Pro (Snapdragon)

43h

110. OnePlus 9 Pro

43h

111. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G

43h

112. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4

42h

113. Google Pixel 6 Pro

41h

114. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Exynos)

41h

115. Black Shark 5 Pro

41h

116. Apple iPhone 13 mini

41h

117. Apple iPhone 12 mini

40h

118. POCO F4 GT

40h

119. Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Exynos)

40h

120. Samsung Galaxy S22 (Snapdragon)

39h

121. Honor Magic4 Pro

39h

122. Vivo X51 5G

38h

123. Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G (Snapdragon)

38h

124. Huawei Mate 50 Pro

38h

125. Apple iPhone SE (2022)

37h

126. Xiaomi Mi 11

36h

127. Samsung Galaxy S22 (Exynos)

35h

128. Xiaomi 12 Pro

34h

Position in Advanced Ranking
Battery Life (moderate)

10^th

1. Honor X7a

86h

2. Vivo Y72 5G

85h

3. Oppo A77 5G

76h

4. Honor X8 5G

74h

5. Honor Magic5 Lite 5G

74h

6. Samsung Galaxy M51

73h

7. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S 5G

72h

8. Honor X9a

72h

9. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G

70h

10. Oppo A78 5G

70h

11. Samsung Galaxy A13 5G

69h

12. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro

67h

13. Motorola Moto G62 5G

65h

14. Honor X7

65h

15. Samsung Galaxy A34 5G

65h

16. Oppo A54 5G

65h

17. Samsung Galaxy A23 5G

64h

18. OnePlus Nord CE 5G

64h

19. Vivo Y76 5G

64h

20. Oppo A74

64h

21. Motorola Moto G9 Power

64h

22. Oppo A74 5G

63h

23. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G

62h

24. Honor Magic4 Lite 5G

61h

25. Oppo A94 5G

58h

26. OnePlus Nord 2 5G

54h

27. Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G

54h

28. OnePlus Nord 2T 5G

52h

29. Realme GT Neo 3

52h

30. Huawei P40 Lite

50h

31. Samsung Galaxy A33 5G

47h

Home/Office

160

Oppo A78 5G

213

Honor X7a

A robot housed in a Faraday cage performs a set of touch-based user actions during what we call our “typical usage scenario” (TUS) — making calls, video streaming, etc. — 4 hours of active use over the course of a 16-hour period, plus 8 hours of “sleep.” The robot repeats this set of actions every day until the device runs out of power.

Typical Usage Scenario discharge curves

On the go

162

Oppo A78 5G

195

Samsung Galaxy M51

Using a smartphone on the go takes a toll on autonomy because of extra “hidden” demands, such as the continuous signaling associated with cellphone network selection, for example. DXOMARK Battery experts take the phone outdoors and perform a precisely defined set of activities while following the same three-hour travel itinerary (walking, taking the bus, the subway…) for each device

Autonomy for on the go use cases (full charge)

Calibrated

124

Oppo A78 5G

198

Samsung Galaxy M51

For this series of tests, the smartphone returns to the Faraday cage and our robots repeatedly perform actions linked to one specific use case (such as gaming, video streaming, etc.) at a time. Starting from an 80% charge, all devices are tested until they have expended at least 5% of their battery power.

Autonomy for calibrated use cases (full charge)

Charging

115

Oppo A78 5G

181

Realme GT Neo 3

How Charging score is composed

Charging is fully part of the overall battery experience. In some situations where autonomy is at a minimum, knowing how fast you can charge becomes a concern. The DXOMARK Battery charging score is composed of two sub-scores, (1) Full charge and (2) Quick boost.

Learn more about how we test battery

Wired

49%

in 30 min

0h49

0 - 80%

1h34

Full charge

103

Oppo A78 5G

184

Black Shark 5 Pro

Full charge tests assess the reliability of the battery power gauge; measure how long and how much power the battery takes to charge from zero to 80% capacity, from 80 to 100% as shown by the UI, and until an actual full charge.

Position in Global Ranking
Charging Time 0-80%

70^th

1. Black Shark 5 Pro

0h13

2. Realme GT Neo 3

0h14

3. Nubia RedMagic 6 Pro

0h14

4. OnePlus 10T 5G

0h16

5. POCO F4 GT

0h17

6. Xiaomi 11T Pro

0h18

7. Nubia RedMagic 7 Pro

0h19

8. Oppo Reno8 5G

0h21

9. Realme GT 5G

0h21

10. Xiaomi 12 Pro

0h21

11. OnePlus 9

0h21

12. Oppo Reno6 5G

0h22

13. Xiaomi 12T Pro

0h22

14. OnePlus 9 Pro

0h22

15. Honor Magic4 Pro

0h22

16. OnePlus Nord 2 5G

0h22

17. Oppo Find X5 Lite

0h22

18. OnePlus Nord 2T 5G

0h22

19. Oppo Reno6 Pro 5G (Snapdragon)

0h22

20. Oppo Reno8 Pro 5G

0h23

21. Oppo Find X3 Pro

0h23

22. Oppo Find X3 Neo

0h23

23. Xiaomi 13 Pro

0h23

24. Oppo Find X5 Pro

0h23

25. Vivo X80 Pro (Snapdragon)

0h24

26. Oppo Find X5

0h25

27. OnePlus 8T

0h25

28. Xiaomi 12T

0h25

29. Realme GT Neo 2 5G

0h25

30. Oppo Find X3 Lite

0h26

31. OnePlus 10 Pro

0h26

32. Realme GT 2 Pro

0h26

33. Xiaomi 12

0h27

34. Huawei Mate 50 Pro

0h28

35. Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra

0h28

36. Honor Magic4 Lite 5G

0h28

37. Xiaomi 13

0h29

38. Xiaomi 12 Lite 5G

0h29

39. Xiaomi 11T

0h30

40. Huawei P50 Pro

0h30

41. Xiaomi Mi 11

0h31

42. Honor 70

0h32

43. Motorola Edge 30 Pro

0h34

44. Huawei P40 Lite

0h34

45. Asus ROG Phone 6

0h35

46. Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra (Snapdragon)

0h37

47. Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Exynos)

0h37

48. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G

0h38

49. Oppo A94 5G

0h39

50. Vivo Y76 5G

0h39

51. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Snapdragon)

0h39

52. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos)

0h40

53. Vivo X60 Pro 5G (Snapdragon)

0h40

54. Vivo X51 5G

0h41

55. Vivo X80 Lite 5G

0h42

56. OnePlus Nord CE 5G

0h42

57. Motorola Edge 20 Pro

0h43

58. Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G

0h43

59. Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro 5G

0h43

60. Oppo Reno8 Lite 5G

0h44

61. Asus Zenfone 8

0h45

62. Honor Magic5 Lite 5G

0h46

63. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Snapdragon)

0h46

64. Nothing Phone(1)

0h47

65. Oppo A74

0h48

66. Samsung Galaxy S21 5G (Exynos)

0h48

67. Samsung Galaxy S21 5G (Snapdragon)

0h49

68. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11

0h49

69. Apple iPhone 13 Pro

0h49

70. Oppo A78 5G

0h49

71. Samsung Galaxy A23 5G

0h49

72. Oppo A77 5G

0h50

73. Samsung Galaxy S22 (Snapdragon)

0h50

74. Samsung Galaxy S22 (Exynos)

0h51

75. Apple iPhone SE (2022)

0h51

75. Samsung Galaxy A34 5G

0h51

77. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Exynos)

0h51

78. Apple iPhone 12 mini

0h52

79. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10

0h52

80. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S

0h52

81. Apple iPhone 14 Pro

0h52

82. Samsung Galaxy A54 5G

0h52

83. Honor X9a

0h53

84. Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G (Snapdragon)

0h53

85. Apple iPhone 14

0h54

86. Samsung Galaxy A33 5G

0h54

86. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S 5G

0h54

88. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro

0h55

89. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4

0h56

90. Samsung Galaxy A53 5G

0h57

91. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4

0h57

92. Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max

0h57

93. Apple iPhone 13 mini

0h57

94. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G

0h57

95. Samsung Galaxy A72

0h58

96. Apple iPhone 13

0h58

97. Google Pixel 7

1h00

98. Asus Zenfone 8 Flip

1h01

99. Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max

1h01

100. Honor X8 5G

1h02

101. Google Pixel 6 Pro

1h02

102. Google Pixel 6

1h03

102. Apple iPhone 14 Plus

1h03

104. Google Pixel 7 Pro

1h03

105. Honor X7

1h05

106. Sony Xperia 1 IV

1h05

107. Sony Xperia 5 IV

1h05

108. Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max

1h06

109. Honor X7a

1h10

110. Google Pixel 6a

1h11

111. Google Pixel 5

1h14

112. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G

1h15

113. Vivo Y72 5G

1h18

114. Oppo A74 5G

1h21

115. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G

1h22

116. Samsung Galaxy M51

1h23

117. Xiaomi Redmi 10 2022

1h25

118. Vivo Y20s

1h25

119. Motorola Moto G62 5G

1h26

120. Samsung Galaxy A13 5G

1h30

121. Sony Xperia 10 IV

1h45

122. Wiko Power U30

1h47

123. Realme C21

1h50

124. Oppo A54 5G

1h51

125. Xiaomi Redmi 9

1h52

126. Motorola Moto G9 Power

1h53

127. Realme C11

1h56

128. Wiko Power U20

2h22

Position in Advanced Ranking
Charging Time 0-80%

14^th

1. Realme GT Neo 3

0h14

2. OnePlus Nord 2 5G

0h22

3. OnePlus Nord 2T 5G

0h22

4. Honor Magic4 Lite 5G

0h28

5. Huawei P40 Lite

0h34

6. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G

0h38

7. Oppo A94 5G

0h39

8. Vivo Y76 5G

0h39

9. OnePlus Nord CE 5G

0h42

10. Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G

0h43

11. Honor Magic5 Lite 5G

0h46

12. Oppo A74

0h48

13. Samsung Galaxy A23 5G

0h49

14. Oppo A78 5G

0h49

15. Oppo A77 5G

0h50

16. Samsung Galaxy A34 5G

0h51

17. Honor X9a

0h53

18. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S 5G

0h54

18. Samsung Galaxy A33 5G

0h54

20. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro

0h55

21. Honor X8 5G

1h02

22. Honor X7

1h05

23. Honor X7a

1h10

24. Vivo Y72 5G

1h18

25. Oppo A74 5G

1h21

26. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G

1h22

27. Samsung Galaxy M51

1h23

28. Motorola Moto G62 5G

1h26

29. Samsung Galaxy A13 5G

1h30

30. Oppo A54 5G

1h51

31. Motorola Moto G9 Power

1h53

Power consumption and battery level during full charge

The charging curves, in wired and wireless (if available) showing the evolution of the battery level indicator as well as the power consumption in watts during the stages of charging toward full capacity.

Time to full charge

The time to full charge chart breaks down the necessary time to reach 80%, 100% and full charge.

Quick boost

128

Oppo A78 5G

182

Realme GT Neo 3

With the phone at different charge levels (20%, 40%, 60%, 80%), Quick boost tests measure the amount of charge the battery receives after being plugged in for 5 minutes. The chart here compares the average autonomy gain from a quick 5-minute charge.

Average autonomy gain for a 5 minute charge (wired)

Efficiency

124

Oppo A78 5G

154

Oppo Reno6 5G

How Efficiency score is composed

The DXOMARK power efficiency score consists of two sub-scores, Charge up and Discharge rate, both of which combine data obtained during robot-based typical usage scenario, calibrated tests and charging evaluation, taking into consideration the device’s battery capacity. DXOMARK calculate the annual power consumption of the product, shown on below graph, which is representative of the overall efficiency during a charge and when in use.

Learn more about how we test battery

Annual Consumption Oppo A78 5G

3.7 kWh

Efficient

Good

Bad

Inefficient

Charge up

127

Oppo A78 5G

205

Nubia RedMagic 7 Pro

The charge up sub-score is a combination of four factors: the overall efficiency of a full charge, related to how much energy you need to fill up the battery compared to the energy that the battery can provide; the efficiency of the travel adapter when it comes to transferring power from an outlet to your phone; the residual consumption when your phone is fully charged and still plugged into the charger; and the residual consumption of the charger itself, when the smartphone is disconnected from it. The chart here below shows the overall efficiency of a full charge in %.

Overall charge efficiency

Discharge

122

Oppo A78 5G

194

Apple iPhone 14 Pro

The discharge subscore rates the speed of a battery’s discharge during a test, which is independent of the battery’s capacity. It is the ratio of a battery’s capacity divided by its autonomy. A small-capacity battery could have the same autonomy as a large-capacity battery, indicating that the device is well-optimized, with a low discharge rate.

Average discharge current

The post Oppo A78 5G Battery test appeared first on DXOMARK.

Samsung Galaxy A34 5G Battery test

DXOMARK — Tue, 21 Mar 2023 14:30:29 +0000

We put the Samsung Galaxy A34 5G through our rigorous DXOMARK Battery test suite to measure its performance in autonomy, charging and efficiency. In these test results, we will break down how it fared in a variety of tests and several common use cases.

Overview

Key specifications:

Battery capacity: 5000 mAh
25W charger (not included)
6.6-inch, 1080 x 2340 (FHD+), 120 Hz, OLED display
MediaTek Dimensity 1080 (6 nm)
Tested ROM / RAM combination: 128 GB + 6 GB

Scoring

Sub-scores and attributes included in the calculations of the global score.

Samsung Galaxy A34 5G

129

battery

143
autonomy

Home/Office

155

213

On the go

149

195

Calibrated

123

198

113
charging

Full charge

105

184

Quick boost

121

182

121
efficiency

Charge up

126

205

Discharge

118

194

Key performances

2 days 17h

Battery life

0h51

80% Charging time

1h42

Full charging time

3h53 autonomy

after 5-minute charge

Position in Global Ranking

33^rd

1. Honor Magic5 Lite 5G

152

2. Honor X7a

147

3. Oppo Reno6 5G

146

4. Realme GT Neo 2 5G

144

5. Honor X9a

143

6. Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra (Snapdragon)

142

7. Oppo Reno8 5G

141

8. Asus ROG Phone 6

140

9. Oppo Reno8 Lite 5G

139

10. Oppo A77 5G

138

10. Sony Xperia 10 IV

138

12. Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max

136

12. OnePlus Nord CE 5G

136

12. Samsung Galaxy M51

136

12. Vivo Y72 5G

136

12. Vivo X80 Lite 5G

136

12. Xiaomi 11T

136

18. Honor Magic4 Lite 5G

135

18. Oppo Find X5 Lite

135

20. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G

134

20. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10

134

22. Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max

133

22. Oppo A74

133

22. Vivo Y76 5G

133

22. Vivo X60 Pro 5G (Snapdragon)

133

22. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S 5G

133

27. Honor X8 5G

132

27. Oppo A78 5G

132

27. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S

132

30. Samsung Galaxy A72

131

30. Wiko Power U30

131

32. Oppo Reno6 Pro 5G (Snapdragon)

130

33. Realme GT Neo 3

129

33. Samsung Galaxy A34 5G

129

33. Samsung Galaxy A23 5G

129

33. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro

129

37. Apple iPhone 14 Plus

128

37. OnePlus Nord 2 5G

128

37. Xiaomi 13

128

40. Nubia RedMagic 6 Pro

127

40. Oppo A94 5G

127

42. Honor 70

126

42. OnePlus 10T 5G

126

42. Oppo Find X3 Neo

126

42. Xiaomi 13 Pro

126

42. Xiaomi 11T Pro

126

47. Samsung Galaxy A13 5G

125

48. Huawei P50 Pro

123

48. Xiaomi 12T Pro

123

50. OnePlus 9

122

51. Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max

121

51. Oppo A74 5G

121

53. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G

120

54. Apple iPhone 14 Pro

119

54. Nothing Phone(1)

119

54. Oppo A54 5G

119

54. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11

119

58. Apple iPhone 13 Pro

118

58. Motorola Edge 20 Pro

118

58. Nubia RedMagic 7 Pro

118

58. Xiaomi 12T

118

58. Xiaomi 12 Lite 5G

118

63. Realme GT 2 Pro

117

64. Honor X7

116

64. Oppo Find X5 Pro

116

64. Vivo Y20s

116

67. Apple iPhone 13

115

67. Oppo Reno8 Pro 5G

115

67. Realme GT 5G

115

70. Huawei P40 Lite

114

70. Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro 5G

114

72. Samsung Galaxy A54 5G

113

72. Sony Xperia 5 IV

113

74. Apple iPhone 14

112

74. Motorola Moto G62 5G

112

74. OnePlus Nord 2T 5G

112

74. OnePlus 8T

112

78. Motorola Moto G9 Power

111

78. Oppo Find X5

111

78. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Snapdragon)

111

81. Wiko Power U20

110

82. Oppo Find X3 Lite

109

83. Samsung Galaxy S21 5G (Snapdragon)

108

83. Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra

108

85. Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G

107

86. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G

106

87. Black Shark 5 Pro

105

87. Oppo Find X3 Pro

105

89. OnePlus 9 Pro

104

90. Huawei Mate 50 Pro

103

90. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Snapdragon)

103

92. Asus Zenfone 8 Flip

102

92. Asus Zenfone 8

102

92. Google Pixel 7 Pro

102

95. OnePlus 10 Pro

100

95. POCO F4 GT

100

95. Samsung Galaxy S21 5G (Exynos)

100

95. Xiaomi Redmi 10 2022

100

95. Xiaomi 12

100

100. Apple iPhone 13 mini

100. Realme C21

100. Realme C11

100. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4

100. Vivo X80 Pro (Snapdragon)

105. Google Pixel 7

105. Motorola Edge 30 Pro

105. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos)

108. Google Pixel 6

109. Samsung Galaxy A33 5G

109. Vivo X51 5G

111. Honor Magic4 Pro

111. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4

111. Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Exynos)

111. Samsung Galaxy A53 5G

115. Google Pixel 6a

116. Apple iPhone 12 mini

116. Google Pixel 5

116. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Exynos)

119. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G

120. Samsung Galaxy S22 (Snapdragon)

121. Xiaomi Redmi 9

122. Sony Xperia 1 IV

123. Apple iPhone SE (2022)

124. Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G (Snapdragon)

124. Xiaomi Mi 11

126. Google Pixel 6 Pro

127. Xiaomi 12 Pro

128. Samsung Galaxy S22 (Exynos)

Position in Advanced Ranking

15^th

1. Honor Magic5 Lite 5G

152

2. Honor X7a

147

3. Honor X9a

143

4. Oppo A77 5G

138

5. OnePlus Nord CE 5G

136

5. Samsung Galaxy M51

136

5. Vivo Y72 5G

136

8. Honor Magic4 Lite 5G

135

9. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G

134

10. Oppo A74

133

10. Vivo Y76 5G

133

10. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S 5G

133

13. Honor X8 5G

132

13. Oppo A78 5G

132

15. Realme GT Neo 3

129

15. Samsung Galaxy A34 5G

129

15. Samsung Galaxy A23 5G

129

15. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro

129

19. OnePlus Nord 2 5G

128

20. Oppo A94 5G

127

21. Samsung Galaxy A13 5G

125

22. Oppo A74 5G

121

23. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G

120

24. Oppo A54 5G

119

25. Honor X7

116

26. Huawei P40 Lite

114

27. Motorola Moto G62 5G

112

27. OnePlus Nord 2T 5G

112

29. Motorola Moto G9 Power

111

30. Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G

107

31. Samsung Galaxy A33 5G

Pros

Very good autonomy with more than 2.5 when used moderately
Excellent autonomy when using the GPS on the go
Very low residual consumption of the charger when the device is fully charged, and either plugged in or not

Cons

Poor autonomy when listening to music
Low autonomy gained after a quick 5-minute charge

The Samsung Galaxy A34 5G’s battery performance earned the device a global score that was above average in our database.

During the autonomy tests, the Galaxy A34 5G showed excellent results when used in factory default mode. The battery lasted more than 2.5 days during our typical usage scenario, and the autonomy on the go, especially when using the GPS, was very good. When testing specific usages, the results were not as good, but the overall autonomy remain above average. The device struggled when streaming music.

The charging time was longer than average, taking 1 hour and 42 minutes to fully charge the battery. The autonomy gained after a quick 5-minute charge was also below average with only 3 hours and 53 minutes recovered on average. Nevertheless, the charger’s residual power drain was very low when the device was fully charged and either plugged in or not.
The charge efficiency was average. The discharge currents were quite low on the go and average when testing individual usages, meaning that the device is quite well optimized.

When compared with other devices from the Advanced price segment, the Samsung Galaxy A34 5G ranked in the middle of our database, a huge improvement over its predecessor the Samsung Galaxy A33 5G, which ranked at the low end of the segment. The Galaxy A34 5G’s autonomy score was decent, but the charging and efficiency scores were slightly below the average.

Test Summary

	Battery	Charger	Wireless	Display	Processor
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G	5000mAh	25W (not included)	-	OLED 1080 x 2340	MediaTek Dimensity 1080
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G	5000mAh	25W (not included)	-	Super AMOLED 1080 x 2400	Samsung Exynos 1280
Honor Magic5 Lite 5G	5100mAh	40W (not included)	-	AMOLED 1080 x 2400	Qualcomm Snapdragon 695

Autonomy

143

Samsung Galaxy A34 5G

188

Honor X7a

How Autonomy score is composed

Learn more about how we test battery

94h

Light Usage

Active: 2h30/day

65h

Moderate Usage

Active: 4h/day

41h

Intense Usage

Active: 7h/day

Position in Global Ranking
Battery Life (moderate)

25^th

1. Honor X7a

86h

2. Vivo Y72 5G

85h

3. Wiko Power U30

80h

4. Sony Xperia 10 IV

80h

5. Oppo A77 5G

76h

6. Honor X8 5G

74h

7. Honor Magic5 Lite 5G

74h

8. Samsung Galaxy M51

73h

9. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S 5G

72h

10. Asus ROG Phone 6

72h

11. Honor X9a

72h

12. Wiko Power U20

71h

13. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G

70h

14. Oppo A78 5G

70h

15. Vivo Y20s

69h

16. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10

69h

17. Samsung Galaxy A13 5G

69h

18. Samsung Galaxy A72

69h

19. Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max

68h

20. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro

67h

21. Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra (Snapdragon)

67h

22. Oppo Reno8 Lite 5G

66h

23. Motorola Moto G62 5G

65h

24. Honor X7

65h

25. Samsung Galaxy A34 5G

65h

26. Oppo A54 5G

65h

27. Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max

65h

28. Samsung Galaxy A23 5G

64h

29. OnePlus Nord CE 5G

64h

30. Vivo Y76 5G

64h

31. Oppo A74

64h

32. Motorola Moto G9 Power

64h

33. Oppo A74 5G

63h

34. Apple iPhone 14 Plus

63h

35. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G

62h

36. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S

61h

37. Honor Magic4 Lite 5G

61h

38. Samsung Galaxy A54 5G

60h

39. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11

60h

40. Xiaomi 13 Pro

60h

41. Realme GT Neo 2 5G

60h

42. Xiaomi 11T

59h

43. Vivo X80 Lite 5G

59h

44. Realme C11

59h

45. Honor 70

58h

46. Oppo Find X5 Lite

58h

47. Oppo A94 5G

58h

48. Oppo Reno8 5G

58h

49. Realme C21

57h

50. Oppo Reno6 5G

57h

51. Sony Xperia 5 IV

57h

52. Xiaomi Redmi 10 2022

57h

53. Xiaomi 11T Pro

57h

54. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G

56h

55. OnePlus 10T 5G

55h

56. OnePlus Nord 2 5G

54h

57. Nothing Phone(1)

54h

58. OnePlus 9

54h

59. Xiaomi 13

54h

60. Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G

54h

61. Apple iPhone 14 Pro

54h

62. Xiaomi 12T Pro

54h

63. Apple iPhone 13 Pro

53h

64. Xiaomi 12 Lite 5G

53h

65. Nubia RedMagic 7 Pro

53h

66. Apple iPhone 14

53h

67. Apple iPhone 13

52h

68. Motorola Edge 20 Pro

52h

69. OnePlus Nord 2T 5G

52h

70. Realme GT Neo 3

52h

71. Xiaomi 12T

52h

72. Google Pixel 7 Pro

52h

73. Realme GT 5G

52h

74. Huawei P50 Pro

51h

75. Oppo Find X3 Neo

51h

76. Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro 5G

51h

77. Vivo X60 Pro 5G (Snapdragon)

51h

78. Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra

50h

79. Google Pixel 6a

50h

80. Huawei P40 Lite

50h

81. Realme GT 2 Pro

50h

82. Xiaomi Redmi 9

50h

83. Samsung Galaxy S21 5G (Snapdragon)

50h

84. Samsung Galaxy A53 5G

49h

85. Asus Zenfone 8 Flip

49h

86. Oppo Find X5 Pro

49h

87. Oppo Reno8 Pro 5G

49h

88. Google Pixel 7

49h

89. Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max

49h

90. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4

49h

91. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Snapdragon)

48h

92. Google Pixel 6

48h

93. Oppo Reno6 Pro 5G (Snapdragon)

48h

94. Oppo Find X5

48h

95. Motorola Edge 30 Pro

47h

96. Samsung Galaxy A33 5G

47h

97. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Snapdragon)

47h

98. Sony Xperia 1 IV

47h

99. Samsung Galaxy S21 5G (Exynos)

46h

100. Oppo Find X3 Lite

46h

101. Nubia RedMagic 6 Pro

46h

102. Xiaomi 12

45h

103. OnePlus 8T

45h

104. Asus Zenfone 8

45h

105. Google Pixel 5

44h

106. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos)

44h

107. Oppo Find X3 Pro

44h

108. OnePlus 10 Pro

43h

109. Vivo X80 Pro (Snapdragon)

43h

110. OnePlus 9 Pro

43h

111. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G

43h

112. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4

42h

113. Google Pixel 6 Pro

41h

114. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Exynos)

41h

115. Black Shark 5 Pro

41h

116. Apple iPhone 13 mini

41h

117. Apple iPhone 12 mini

40h

118. POCO F4 GT

40h

119. Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Exynos)

40h

120. Samsung Galaxy S22 (Snapdragon)

39h

121. Honor Magic4 Pro

39h

122. Vivo X51 5G

38h

123. Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G (Snapdragon)

38h

124. Huawei Mate 50 Pro

38h

125. Apple iPhone SE (2022)

37h

126. Xiaomi Mi 11

36h

127. Samsung Galaxy S22 (Exynos)

35h

128. Xiaomi 12 Pro

34h

Position in Advanced Ranking
Battery Life (moderate)

15^th

1. Honor X7a

86h

2. Vivo Y72 5G

85h

3. Oppo A77 5G

76h

4. Honor X8 5G

74h

5. Honor Magic5 Lite 5G

74h

6. Samsung Galaxy M51

73h

7. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S 5G

72h

8. Honor X9a

72h

9. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G

70h

10. Oppo A78 5G

70h

11. Samsung Galaxy A13 5G

69h

12. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro

67h

13. Motorola Moto G62 5G

65h

14. Honor X7

65h

15. Samsung Galaxy A34 5G

65h

16. Oppo A54 5G

65h

17. Samsung Galaxy A23 5G

64h

18. OnePlus Nord CE 5G

64h

19. Vivo Y76 5G

64h

20. Oppo A74

64h

21. Motorola Moto G9 Power

64h

22. Oppo A74 5G

63h

23. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G

62h

24. Honor Magic4 Lite 5G

61h

25. Oppo A94 5G

58h

26. OnePlus Nord 2 5G

54h

27. Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G

54h

28. OnePlus Nord 2T 5G

52h

29. Realme GT Neo 3

52h

30. Huawei P40 Lite

50h

31. Samsung Galaxy A33 5G

47h

Home/Office

155

Samsung Galaxy A34 5G

213

Honor X7a

Typical Usage Scenario discharge curves

On the go

149

Samsung Galaxy A34 5G

195

Samsung Galaxy M51

Autonomy for on the go use cases (full charge)

Calibrated

123

Samsung Galaxy A34 5G

198

Samsung Galaxy M51

Autonomy for calibrated use cases (full charge)

Charging

113

Samsung Galaxy A34 5G

181

Realme GT Neo 3

How Charging score is composed

Learn more about how we test battery

Wired

52%

in 30 min

0h51

0 - 80%

1h42

Full charge

105

Samsung Galaxy A34 5G

184

Black Shark 5 Pro

Position in Global Ranking
Charging Time 0-80%

75^th

1. Black Shark 5 Pro

0h13

2. Realme GT Neo 3

0h14

3. Nubia RedMagic 6 Pro

0h14

4. OnePlus 10T 5G

0h16

5. POCO F4 GT

0h17

6. Xiaomi 11T Pro

0h18

7. Nubia RedMagic 7 Pro

0h19

8. Oppo Reno8 5G

0h21

9. Realme GT 5G

0h21

10. Xiaomi 12 Pro

0h21

11. OnePlus 9

0h21

12. Oppo Reno6 5G

0h22

13. Xiaomi 12T Pro

0h22

14. OnePlus 9 Pro

0h22

15. Honor Magic4 Pro

0h22

16. OnePlus Nord 2 5G

0h22

17. Oppo Find X5 Lite

0h22

18. OnePlus Nord 2T 5G

0h22

19. Oppo Reno6 Pro 5G (Snapdragon)

0h22

20. Oppo Reno8 Pro 5G

0h23

21. Oppo Find X3 Pro

0h23

22. Oppo Find X3 Neo

0h23

23. Xiaomi 13 Pro

0h23

24. Oppo Find X5 Pro

0h23

25. Vivo X80 Pro (Snapdragon)

0h24

26. Oppo Find X5

0h25

27. OnePlus 8T

0h25

28. Xiaomi 12T

0h25

29. Realme GT Neo 2 5G

0h25

30. Oppo Find X3 Lite

0h26

31. OnePlus 10 Pro

0h26

32. Realme GT 2 Pro

0h26

33. Xiaomi 12

0h27

34. Huawei Mate 50 Pro

0h28

35. Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra

0h28

36. Honor Magic4 Lite 5G

0h28

37. Xiaomi 13

0h29

38. Xiaomi 12 Lite 5G

0h29

39. Xiaomi 11T

0h30

40. Huawei P50 Pro

0h30

41. Xiaomi Mi 11

0h31

42. Honor 70

0h32

43. Motorola Edge 30 Pro

0h34

44. Huawei P40 Lite

0h34

45. Asus ROG Phone 6

0h35

46. Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra (Snapdragon)

0h37

47. Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Exynos)

0h37

48. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G

0h38

49. Oppo A94 5G

0h39

50. Vivo Y76 5G

0h39

51. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Snapdragon)

0h39

52. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos)

0h40

53. Vivo X60 Pro 5G (Snapdragon)

0h40

54. Vivo X51 5G

0h41

55. Vivo X80 Lite 5G

0h42

56. OnePlus Nord CE 5G

0h42

57. Motorola Edge 20 Pro

0h43

58. Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G

0h43

59. Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro 5G

0h43

60. Oppo Reno8 Lite 5G

0h44

61. Asus Zenfone 8

0h45

62. Honor Magic5 Lite 5G

0h46

63. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Snapdragon)

0h46

64. Nothing Phone(1)

0h47

65. Oppo A74

0h48

66. Samsung Galaxy S21 5G (Exynos)

0h48

67. Samsung Galaxy S21 5G (Snapdragon)

0h49

68. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11

0h49

69. Apple iPhone 13 Pro

0h49

70. Oppo A78 5G

0h49

71. Samsung Galaxy A23 5G

0h49

72. Oppo A77 5G

0h50

73. Samsung Galaxy S22 (Snapdragon)

0h50

74. Samsung Galaxy S22 (Exynos)

0h51

75. Apple iPhone SE (2022)

0h51

75. Samsung Galaxy A34 5G

0h51

77. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Exynos)

0h51

78. Apple iPhone 12 mini

0h52

79. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10

0h52

80. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S

0h52

81. Apple iPhone 14 Pro

0h52

82. Samsung Galaxy A54 5G

0h52

83. Honor X9a

0h53

84. Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G (Snapdragon)

0h53

85. Apple iPhone 14

0h54

86. Samsung Galaxy A33 5G

0h54

86. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S 5G

0h54

88. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro

0h55

89. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4

0h56

90. Samsung Galaxy A53 5G

0h57

91. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4

0h57

92. Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max

0h57

93. Apple iPhone 13 mini

0h57

94. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G

0h57

95. Samsung Galaxy A72

0h58

96. Apple iPhone 13

0h58

97. Google Pixel 7

1h00

98. Asus Zenfone 8 Flip

1h01

99. Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max

1h01

100. Honor X8 5G

1h02

101. Google Pixel 6 Pro

1h02

102. Google Pixel 6

1h03

102. Apple iPhone 14 Plus

1h03

104. Google Pixel 7 Pro

1h03

105. Honor X7

1h05

106. Sony Xperia 1 IV

1h05

107. Sony Xperia 5 IV

1h05

108. Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max

1h06

109. Honor X7a

1h10

110. Google Pixel 6a

1h11

111. Google Pixel 5

1h14

112. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G

1h15

113. Vivo Y72 5G

1h18

114. Oppo A74 5G

1h21

115. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G

1h22

116. Samsung Galaxy M51

1h23

117. Xiaomi Redmi 10 2022

1h25

118. Vivo Y20s

1h25

119. Motorola Moto G62 5G

1h26

120. Samsung Galaxy A13 5G

1h30

121. Sony Xperia 10 IV

1h45

122. Wiko Power U30

1h47

123. Realme C21

1h50

124. Oppo A54 5G

1h51

125. Xiaomi Redmi 9

1h52

126. Motorola Moto G9 Power

1h53

127. Realme C11

1h56

128. Wiko Power U20

2h22

Position in Advanced Ranking
Charging Time 0-80%

16^th

1. Realme GT Neo 3

0h14

2. OnePlus Nord 2 5G

0h22

3. OnePlus Nord 2T 5G

0h22

4. Honor Magic4 Lite 5G

0h28

5. Huawei P40 Lite

0h34

6. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G

0h38

7. Oppo A94 5G

0h39

8. Vivo Y76 5G

0h39

9. OnePlus Nord CE 5G

0h42

10. Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G

0h43

11. Honor Magic5 Lite 5G

0h46

12. Oppo A74

0h48

13. Samsung Galaxy A23 5G

0h49

14. Oppo A78 5G

0h49

15. Oppo A77 5G

0h50

16. Samsung Galaxy A34 5G

0h51

17. Honor X9a

0h53

18. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S 5G

0h54

18. Samsung Galaxy A33 5G

0h54

20. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro

0h55

21. Honor X8 5G

1h02

22. Honor X7

1h05

23. Honor X7a

1h10

24. Vivo Y72 5G

1h18

25. Oppo A74 5G

1h21

26. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G

1h22

27. Samsung Galaxy M51

1h23

28. Motorola Moto G62 5G

1h26

29. Samsung Galaxy A13 5G

1h30

30. Oppo A54 5G

1h51

31. Motorola Moto G9 Power

1h53

Power consumption and battery level during full charge

Time to full charge

The time to full charge chart breaks down the necessary time to reach 80%, 100% and full charge.

Quick boost

121

Samsung Galaxy A34 5G

182

Realme GT Neo 3

Average autonomy gain for a 5 minute charge (wired)

Efficiency

121

Samsung Galaxy A34 5G

154

Oppo Reno6 5G

How Efficiency score is composed

Learn more about how we test battery

Annual Consumption Samsung Galaxy A34 5G

3.6 kWh

Efficient

Good

Bad

Inefficient

Charge up

126

Samsung Galaxy A34 5G

205

Nubia RedMagic 7 Pro

Overall charge efficiency

Discharge

118

Samsung Galaxy A34 5G

194

Apple iPhone 14 Pro

Average discharge current

The post Samsung Galaxy A34 5G Battery test appeared first on DXOMARK.

Samsung Galaxy A34 5G Camera test

DXOMARK — Tue, 21 Mar 2023 14:27:14 +0000

We put the Samsung Galaxy A34 5G through our rigorous DXOMARK Camera test suite to measure its performance in photo, video, and zoom quality from an end-user perspective. This article breaks down how the device fared in a variety of tests and several common use cases and is intended to highlight the most important results of our testing with an extract of the captured data.

Overview

Key camera specifications:

Primary: 48MP 1/2″ sensor, 0.8μm pixels, f/1.8 aperture lens, PDAF, OIS
Ultra-wide: 8MP 1/4″ sensor, 1.12μm pixels, f/2.2 aperture lens.
Macro : 5MP sensor, f/2.4 aperture lens.

Scoring

Sub-scores and attributes included in the calculations of the global score.

Samsung Galaxy A34 5G

camera

99
photo

117

119

116

114

116

45
bokeh

48
preview

76
zoom

116

117

78
video

115

117

117

115

118

117

Use cases & Conditions

Use case scores indicate the product performance in specific situations. They are not included in the overall score calculations.

BEST 168

Outdoor

Photos & videos shot in bright light conditions (≥1000 lux)

BEST 157

Indoor

Photos & videos shot in good lighting conditions (≥100lux)

BEST 127

Lowlight

Photos & videos shot in low lighting conditions (<100 lux)

BEST 143

Friends & Family

Portrait and group photo & videos

Position in Global Ranking

97^th

1. Honor Magic5 Pro

152

2. Huawei Mate 50 Pro

149

3. Google Pixel 7 Pro

147

3. Honor Magic4 Ultimate

147

5. Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max

146

5. Apple iPhone 14 Pro

146

7. Huawei P50 Pro

143

8. Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max

141

8. Apple iPhone 13 Pro

141

8. Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra

141

11. Google Pixel 7

140

11. Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra (Snapdragon)

140

11. Vivo X90 Pro+

140

14. Huawei Mate 40 Pro+

139

15. Vivo X80 Pro (Snapdragon)

137

16. Vivo X90 Pro

136

16. Xiaomi 13 Pro

136

16. Xiaomi 12S Ultra

136

19. Huawei Mate 40 Pro

135

19. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Snapdragon)

135

19. Vivo X80 Pro (MediaTek)

135

22. Google Pixel 6 Pro

134

22. Vivo X70 Pro+

134

24. Apple iPhone 14 Plus

133

24. Apple iPhone 14

133

24. Samsung Galaxy S23 Plus (Snapdragon)

133

24. Samsung Galaxy S23 (Snapdragon)

133

28. Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max

131

28. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos)

131

30. Oppo Find X5 Pro

130

30. Xiaomi 13

130

32. Huawei P40 Pro

129

32. Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra

129

32. Xiaomi 12T Pro

129

32. Xiaomi 12 Pro

129

36. Oppo Find X3 Pro

128

37. Apple iPhone 12 Pro

127

37. Asus Smartphone for Snapdragon Insiders

127

39. Google Pixel 6

126

39. Honor Magic4 Pro

126

39. Vivo X70 Pro (MediaTek)

126

39. Vivo X60 Pro+

126

43. Apple iPhone 13 mini

125

43. Apple iPhone 13

125

43. Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Exynos)

125

43. Vivo X50 Pro+

125

47. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4

124

47. Xiaomi Mi 11 Pro

124

49. Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max

122

49. Google Pixel 6a

122

49. OnePlus 10 Pro

122

49. OnePlus 9 Pro

122

53. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G

120

53. Samsung Galaxy S22 (Exynos)

120

55. Sony Xperia 5 IV

119

56. Sony Xperia 1 IV

118

57. Apple iPhone 12

117

57. Apple iPhone 12 mini

117

57. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Snapdragon)

117

57. Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G (Snapdragon)

117

57. Samsung Galaxy S21 5G (Snapdragon)

117

62. Apple iPhone 11

116

62. Asus Zenfone 8

116

62. Vivo X60 Pro 5G (Snapdragon)

116

65. Honor 70

115

65. Samsung Galaxy S21+ 5G (Snapdragon)

115

65. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Exynos)

115

65. Xiaomi 12T

115

69. Nothing Phone(1)

114

69. OnePlus Nord 2T 5G

114

69. Oppo Reno8 Pro 5G

114

69. Oppo Find X5

114

73. OnePlus 8 Pro

113

73. Xiaomi 12

113

75. Oppo Reno8 5G

112

75. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4

112

77. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G

111

77. Samsung Galaxy S21+ 5G (Exynos)

111

77. Samsung Galaxy S21 5G (Exynos)

111

80. Google Pixel 5

109

80. Xiaomi 12 Lite 5G

109

82. Vivo X60 Pro 5G (Exynos)

108

82. Xiaomi 11T Pro

108

84. Samsung Galaxy A54 5G

107

85. Oppo Find X3 Neo

106

86. Sony Xperia 1 III

105

87. Huawei P40

102

88. Black Shark 5 Pro

101

88. Motorola Edge 30 Pro

101

90. Apple iPhone SE (2022)

100

90. Google Pixel 4a

100

92. ZTE Axon 30 Ultra

93. Oppo Find X5 Lite

94. Oppo Reno4 5G

95. Oppo A94 5G

95. Vivo X80 Lite 5G

97. Samsung Galaxy A72

97. Samsung Galaxy A34 5G

99. Oppo Reno6 5G

100. Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G

100. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G

102. Samsung Galaxy A33 5G

103. OnePlus Nord CE 5G

104. Vivo Y76 5G

105. Samsung Galaxy A53 5G

106. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G

107. Realme 9i 5G

108. Honor Magic5 Lite 5G

109. Oppo A78 5G

109. Samsung Galaxy A23 5G

111. Fairphone 4

112. Motorola Moto G62 5G

113. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S 5G

114. Oppo Reno8 Lite 5G

115. Sony Xperia 10 IV

116. Honor X7

116. Honor Magic4 Lite 5G

118. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11

119. Oppo A77 5G

120. Honor X8 5G

121. Xiaomi Redmi 10 2022

122. Crosscall Action-X5

123. Samsung Galaxy A22 5G

124. Crosscall Core-Z5

125. Oppo A57

125. Oppo A16s 5G

Position in Advanced Ranking

4^th

1. OnePlus Nord 2T 5G

114

2. Google Pixel 4a

100

3. Oppo A94 5G

4. Samsung Galaxy A34 5G

5. Samsung Galaxy A33 5G

6. OnePlus Nord CE 5G

7. Vivo Y76 5G

8. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G

9. Realme 9i 5G

10. Honor Magic5 Lite 5G

11. Oppo A78 5G

11. Samsung Galaxy A23 5G

13. Motorola Moto G62 5G

14. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S 5G

15. Honor X7

15. Honor Magic4 Lite 5G

17. Oppo A77 5G

18. Honor X8 5G

19. Samsung Galaxy A22 5G

Pros

Good exposure
Fast and accurate autofocus in photo and video
Effective video stabilization

Cons

Limited dynamic range
Noise under indoor conditions and in low light
Ghosting and fusion artifacts in scenes with motion

The Samsung Galaxy A34 5G was capable of achieving good results in static scenes without too much contrast, making it a good option for landscapes and portraiture. In these kinds of non-demanding conditions, still images offered good exposure and nice detail, but our experts also noticed some image noise in the shadow areas and in blue skies. The autofocus was reactive and accurate in most situations. Video clips recorded with the Galaxy A34 5G were exposed well, with low noise levels. Effective video stabilization ensured smooth footage.

Image quality somewhat dropped in more difficult conditions, such as high-contrast scenes as well as under indoor lighting or in low light. Image detail was reduced while noise became more intrusive. Our testers also noticed some exposure and color instabilities across consecutive shots. Ghosting and fusion artifacts were visible in scenes with moving subjects.

Test summary

About DXOMARK Camera tests: DXOMARK’s Camera evaluations take place in laboratories and in real-world situations using a wide variety of subjects. The scores rely on objective tests for which the results are calculated directly by measurement software on our laboratory setups, and on perceptual tests in which a sophisticated set of metrics allow a panel of image experts to compare aspects of image quality that require human judgment. Testing a smartphone involves a team of engineers and technicians for about a week. Photo, Zoom, and Video quality are scored separately and then combined into an Overall score for comparison among the cameras in different devices. For more information about the DXOMARK Camera protocol, click here. More details on smartphone camera scores are available here. The following section gathers key elements of DXOMARK’s exhaustive tests and analyses. Full performance evaluations are available upon request. Please contact us on how to receive a full report.

Samsung Galaxy A34 5G Camera Scores vs Advanced

This graph compares DXOMARK photo, zoom and video scores between the tested device and references. Average and maximum scores of the price segment are also indicated. Average and maximum scores for each price segment are computed based on the DXOMARK database of devices tested.

Photo

Samsung Galaxy A34 5G

154

Honor Magic5 Pro

About DXOMARK Camera Photo tests

For scoring and analysis, DXOMARK engineers capture and evaluate more than 2,600 test images both in controlled lab environments and in outdoor, indoor and low-light natural scenes, using the camera’s default settings. The photo protocol is designed to take into account the main use cases and is based on typical shooting scenarios, such as portraits, family, and landscape photography. The evaluation is performed by visually inspecting images against a reference of natural scenes, and by running objective measurements on images of charts captured in the lab under different lighting conditions from 1 to 1,000+ lux and color temperatures from 2,300K to 6,500K.

Learn more about how we test camera

Samsung Galaxy A34 5G Photo scores vs Advanced

The photo tests analyze image quality attributes such as exposure, color, texture, and noise in various light conditions. Autofocus performances and the presence of artifacts on all images captured in controlled lab conditions and in real-life images are also evaluated. All these attributes have a significant impact on the final quality of the images captured with the tested device and can help to understand the camera's main strengths and weaknesses.

Samsung Galaxy A34 5G – Good exposure in bright light

Autofocus irregularity and speed: 1000Lux Δ0EV Daylight Handheld

DXOMARK CHART (DMC) detail preservation score vs lux levels for tripod and handheld conditions

This graph shows the evolution of the DMC detail preservation score with the level of lux, for two holding conditions. DMC detail preservation score is derived from an AI-based metric trained to evaluate texture and details rendering on a selection of crops of our DXOMARK chart.

Visual noise evolution with illuminance levels in handheld condition

This graph shows the evolution of visual noise metric with the level of lux in handheld condition. The visual noise metric is the mean of visual noise measurement on all patches of the Dead Leaves chart in the AFHDR setup. DXOMARK visual noise measurement is derived from ISO15739 standard.

Zoom

Samsung Galaxy A34 5G

156

Honor Magic5 Pro

About DXOMARK Camera Zoom tests

DXOMARK engineers capture and evaluate over 400 test images in controlled lab environments and in outdoor, indoor, and low-light natural scenes, using the camera’s default settings and pinch zoom at various zoom factors from ultra wide to very long-range zoom. The evaluation is performed by visually inspecting the images against a reference of natural scenes, and by running objective measurements of chart mages captured in the lab under different conditions from 20 to 1000 lux and color temperatures from 2300K to 6500K.

Learn more about how we test camera

Samsung Galaxy A34 5G Zoom Scores vs Advanced

This graph illustrates the relative scores for the different zoom ranges evaluated. The abscissa is expressed in 35mm equivalent focal length. Zooming-in scores are displayed on the right and Zooming-out scores on the left.

Video

Samsung Galaxy A34 5G

149

Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max

About DXOMARK Camera Video tests

DXOMARK engineers capture and evaluate more than 2.5 hours of video in controlled lab environments and in natural low-light, indoor and outdoor scenes, using the camera’s default settings. The evaluation consists of visually inspecting natural videos taken in various conditions and running objective measurements on videos of charts recorded in the lab under different conditions from 1 to 1000+ lux and color temperatures from 2,300K to 6,500K.

Learn more about how we test camera

Samsung Galaxy A34 5G Video scores vs Advanced

Video tests analyze the same image quality attributes as for still images, such as exposure, color, texture, or noise, in addition to temporal aspects such as speed, and smoothness and stability of exposure, white balance, and autofocus transitions.

Samsung Galaxy A34 5G – Good exposure and effective video stabilization

DXOMARK CHART (DMC) detail preservation video score vs lux levels

This graph shows the evolution of the DMC detail preservation video score with the level of lux in video. DMC detail preservation score is derived from an AI-based metric trained to evaluate texture and details rendering on a selection of crops of our DXOMARK chart.

Spatial Noise
Temporal Noise

Spatial visual noise evolution with the illuminance level

This graph shows the evolution of spatial visual noise with the level of lux. Spatial visual noise is measured on the visual noise chart in the video noise setup. DXOMARK visual noise measurement is derived from ISO15739 standard.

Temporal visual noise evolution with the illuminance level

This graph shows the evolution of temporal visual noise with the level of lux. Temporal visual noise is measured on the visual noise chart in the video noise setup.

The post Samsung Galaxy A34 5G Camera test appeared first on DXOMARK.

Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Camera test

DXOMARK — Mon, 20 Mar 2023 15:10:05 +0000

We put the Samsung A54 5G through our rigorous DXOMARK Camera test suite to measure its performance in photo, video, and zoom quality from an end-user perspective. This article breaks down how the device fared in a variety of tests and several common use cases and is intended to highlight the most important results of our testing with an extract of the captured data.

Overview

Key camera specifications:

Primary: 50MP sensor, f/1.8-aperture lens, PDAF, OIS
Ultra-wide: 12MP sensor, 1.12µm pixels, 123˚ field of view, f/2.2-aperture lens
Macro: 5MP sensor, f/2.4-aperture lens
Video: 4K at 30fps, 1080p at 30/60fps

Scoring

Sub-scores and attributes included in the calculations of the global score.

Samsung Galaxy A54 5G

107

camera

106
photo

117

119

116

114

116

55
bokeh

53
preview

79
zoom

116

100

117

115
video

115

117

117

115

110

118

Artifacts

Stabilization

102

117

Use cases & Conditions

Use case scores indicate the product performance in specific situations. They are not included in the overall score calculations.

BEST 168

Outdoor

Photos & videos shot in bright light conditions (≥1000 lux)

BEST 157

Indoor

Photos & videos shot in good lighting conditions (≥100lux)

BEST 127

Lowlight

Photos & videos shot in low lighting conditions (<100 lux)

BEST 143

Friends & Family

Portrait and group photo & videos

Position in Global Ranking

84^th

1. Honor Magic5 Pro

152

2. Huawei Mate 50 Pro

149

3. Google Pixel 7 Pro

147

3. Honor Magic4 Ultimate

147

5. Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max

146

5. Apple iPhone 14 Pro

146

7. Huawei P50 Pro

143

8. Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max

141

8. Apple iPhone 13 Pro

141

8. Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra

141

11. Google Pixel 7

140

11. Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra (Snapdragon)

140

11. Vivo X90 Pro+

140

14. Huawei Mate 40 Pro+

139

15. Vivo X80 Pro (Snapdragon)

137

16. Vivo X90 Pro

136

16. Xiaomi 13 Pro

136

16. Xiaomi 12S Ultra

136

19. Huawei Mate 40 Pro

135

19. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Snapdragon)

135

19. Vivo X80 Pro (MediaTek)

135

22. Google Pixel 6 Pro

134

22. Vivo X70 Pro+

134

24. Apple iPhone 14 Plus

133

24. Apple iPhone 14

133

24. Samsung Galaxy S23 Plus (Snapdragon)

133

24. Samsung Galaxy S23 (Snapdragon)

133

28. Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max

131

28. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos)

131

30. Oppo Find X5 Pro

130

30. Xiaomi 13

130

32. Huawei P40 Pro

129

32. Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra

129

32. Xiaomi 12T Pro

129

32. Xiaomi 12 Pro

129

36. Oppo Find X3 Pro

128

37. Apple iPhone 12 Pro

127

37. Asus Smartphone for Snapdragon Insiders

127

39. Google Pixel 6

126

39. Honor Magic4 Pro

126

39. Vivo X70 Pro (MediaTek)

126

39. Vivo X60 Pro+

126

43. Apple iPhone 13 mini

125

43. Apple iPhone 13

125

43. Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Exynos)

125

43. Vivo X50 Pro+

125

47. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4

124

47. Xiaomi Mi 11 Pro

124

49. Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max

122

49. Google Pixel 6a

122

49. OnePlus 10 Pro

122

49. OnePlus 9 Pro

122

53. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G

120

53. Samsung Galaxy S22 (Exynos)

120

55. Sony Xperia 5 IV

119

56. Sony Xperia 1 IV

118

57. Apple iPhone 12

117

57. Apple iPhone 12 mini

117

57. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Snapdragon)

117

57. Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G (Snapdragon)

117

57. Samsung Galaxy S21 5G (Snapdragon)

117

62. Apple iPhone 11

116

62. Asus Zenfone 8

116

62. Vivo X60 Pro 5G (Snapdragon)

116

65. Honor 70

115

65. Samsung Galaxy S21+ 5G (Snapdragon)

115

65. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Exynos)

115

65. Xiaomi 12T

115

69. Nothing Phone(1)

114

69. OnePlus Nord 2T 5G

114

69. Oppo Reno8 Pro 5G

114

69. Oppo Find X5

114

73. OnePlus 8 Pro

113

73. Xiaomi 12

113

75. Oppo Reno8 5G

112

75. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4

112

77. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G

111

77. Samsung Galaxy S21+ 5G (Exynos)

111

77. Samsung Galaxy S21 5G (Exynos)

111

80. Google Pixel 5

109

80. Xiaomi 12 Lite 5G

109

82. Vivo X60 Pro 5G (Exynos)

108

82. Xiaomi 11T Pro

108

84. Samsung Galaxy A54 5G

107

85. Oppo Find X3 Neo

106

86. Sony Xperia 1 III

105

87. Huawei P40

102

88. Black Shark 5 Pro

101

88. Motorola Edge 30 Pro

101

90. Apple iPhone SE (2022)

100

90. Google Pixel 4a

100

92. ZTE Axon 30 Ultra

93. Oppo Find X5 Lite

94. Oppo Reno4 5G

95. Oppo A94 5G

95. Vivo X80 Lite 5G

97. Samsung Galaxy A72

97. Samsung Galaxy A34 5G

99. Oppo Reno6 5G

100. Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G

100. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G

102. Samsung Galaxy A33 5G

103. OnePlus Nord CE 5G

104. Vivo Y76 5G

105. Samsung Galaxy A53 5G

106. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G

107. Realme 9i 5G

108. Honor Magic5 Lite 5G

109. Oppo A78 5G

109. Samsung Galaxy A23 5G

111. Fairphone 4

112. Motorola Moto G62 5G

113. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S 5G

114. Oppo Reno8 Lite 5G

115. Sony Xperia 10 IV

116. Honor X7

116. Honor Magic4 Lite 5G

118. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11

119. Oppo A77 5G

120. Honor X8 5G

121. Xiaomi Redmi 10 2022

122. Crosscall Action-X5

123. Samsung Galaxy A22 5G

124. Crosscall Core-Z5

125. Oppo A57

125. Oppo A16s 5G

Position in High-End Ranking

9^th

1. Google Pixel 7

140

2. Google Pixel 6

126

3. Google Pixel 6a

122

4. Honor 70

115

4. Xiaomi 12T

115

6. Nothing Phone(1)

114

7. Oppo Reno8 5G

112

8. Xiaomi 12 Lite 5G

109

9. Samsung Galaxy A54 5G

107

10. Apple iPhone SE (2022)

100

11. Oppo Find X5 Lite

12. Oppo Reno4 5G

13. Vivo X80 Lite 5G

14. Samsung Galaxy A72

15. Oppo Reno6 5G

16. Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G

16. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G

18. Samsung Galaxy A53 5G

19. Fairphone 4

20. Oppo Reno8 Lite 5G

21. Sony Xperia 10 IV

22. Crosscall Action-X5

Pros

Good exposure and wide dynamic range in bright light and indoors
Decent detail in landscape shots
Accurate and repeatable autofocus in most conditions

Cons

Exposure and white balance instabilities
Focus errors in macro mode and scenes with moving elements
Unwanted artifacts, including halo effects, ghosting and color quantization in high-contrast scenes and on moving subjects
Delay between autofocus lock and capture when shooting hand-held in low light

The Samsung Galaxy A54 5G delivered an average performance for a device in the High-End segment in our DXOMARK Camera tests. Still images were well exposed in good light without too much contrast, making the Samsung a decent option for landscape photography. However, our testers noticed white balance and exposure instabilities across consecutive shots, as well as a range of unwanted image artifacts, including ghosting and halo effects. A slow autofocus in low light was an additional limiting factor, making it difficult to react quickly and capture moving subjects.

Test summary

Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Camera Scores vs High-End

Photo

106

Samsung Galaxy A54 5G

154

Honor Magic5 Pro

About DXOMARK Camera Photo tests

Learn more about how we test camera

Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Photo scores

Exposure

Samsung Galaxy A54 5G

117

Honor Magic5 Pro

Color

Samsung Galaxy A54 5G

119

Google Pixel 7 Pro

Exposure and color are the key attributes for technically good pictures. For exposure, the main attribute evaluated is the brightness of the main subject through various use cases such as landscape, portrait, or still life. Other factors evaluated are the contrast and the dynamic range, eg. the ability to render visible details in both bright and dark areas of the image. Repeatability is also important because it demonstrates the camera's ability to provide the same rendering when shooting several images of the same scene.
For color, the image quality attributes analyzed are skin-tone rendering, white balance, color shading, and repeatability. For color and skin tone rendering, we penalize unnatural colors but we respect a manufacturer's choice of color signature.

Samsung Galaxy A54 5G – Underexposed subjects, slight pink cast, slight background overexposure

Samsung Galaxy A53 5G – Slight background overexposure but good color

Motorola Moto G62 5G – Well-exposed faces but pink cast, background overexposure

Autofocus

Samsung Galaxy A54 5G

116

Huawei Mate 50 Pro

Autofocus tests concentrate on focus accuracy, focus repeatability, shooting time delay, and depth of field. Shooting delay is the difference between the time the user presses the capture button and the time the image is actually taken. It includes focusing speed and the capability of the device to capture images at the right time, what is called 'zero shutter lag' capability. Even if a shallow depth of field can be pleasant for a single subject portrait or close-up shot, it can also be a problem in some specific conditions such as group portraits; Both situations are tested. Focus accuracy is also evaluated in all the real-life images taken, from infinity to close-up objects and in low light to outdoor conditions.

Autofocus irregularity and speed: 100Lux Δ7EV TL84 Handheld

This graph illustrates focus accuracy and speed and also zero shutter lag capability by showing the edge acutance versus the shooting time measured on the AFHDR setup on a series of pictures. All pictures were taken at 100Lux with TL84 illuminant, 500ms after the defocus. On this scenario, the backlit panels in the scene are set up to simulate a fairly high dynamic range: the luminance ratio between the brightest point and a 18% reflective gray patch is 7, which we denote by a Exposure Value difference of 7. The edge acutance is measured on the four edges of the Dead Leaves chart, and the shooting time is measured on the LED Universal Timer.

Texture

Samsung Galaxy A54 5G

114

Honor Magic5 Pro

Texture tests analyze the level of details and the texture of subjects in the images taken in the lab as well as in real-life scenarios. For natural shots, particular attention is paid to the level of details in the bright and dark areas of the image. Objective measurements are performed on chart images taken in various lighting conditions from 1 to 1000 lux and different kinds of dynamic range conditions. The charts used are the proprietary DXOMARK chart (DMC) and the Dead Leaves chart.

DXOMARK CHART (DMC) detail preservation score vs lux levels for tripod and handheld conditions

Noise

Samsung Galaxy A54 5G

116

Honor Magic5 Pro

Noise tests analyze various attributes of noise such as intensity, chromaticity, grain, structure on real-life images as well as images of charts taken in the lab. For natural images, particular attention is paid to the noise on faces, landscapes, but also on dark areas and high dynamic range conditions. Noise on moving objects is also evaluated on natural images. Objective measurements are performed on images of charts taken in various conditions from 1 to 1000 lux and different kinds of dynamic range conditions. The chart used is the Dead Leaves chart and the standardized measurement such as Visual Noise derived from ISO 15739.

Visual noise evolution with illuminance levels in handheld condition

Artifacts

Samsung Galaxy A54 5G

Google Pixel 6

The artifacts evaluation looks at lens shading, chromatic aberrations, geometrical distortion, edges ringing, halos, ghosting, quantization, unexpected color hue shifts, among others type of possible unnatural effects on photos. The more severe and the more frequent the artifact, the higher the point deduction on the score. The main artifacts observed and corresponding point loss are listed below.

Main photo artifacts penalties

Preview

Samsung Galaxy A54 5G

Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max

Preview tests analyze the image quality of the camera app's preview of the image, with particular attention paid to the difference between the capture and the preview, especially regarding dynamic range and the application of the bokeh effect. Also evaluated is the smoothness of the exposure, color and focus adaptation when zooming from the minimal to the maximal zoom factor available. The preview frame rate is measured using the LED Universal Timer.

Samsung Galaxy A54 5G – Preview

Samsung Galaxy A54 5G – Capture – Generally a better exposure than preview

Zoom

Samsung Galaxy A54 5G

156

Honor Magic5 Pro

About DXOMARK Camera Zoom tests

Learn more about how we test camera

Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Zoom Scores

Wide

100

Samsung Galaxy A54 5G

117

Huawei Mate 50 Pro

These tests analyze the performance of the ultra-wide camera at several focal lengths from 12 mm to 20 mm. All image quality attributes are evaluated, with particular attention paid to such artifacts as chromatic aberrations, lens softness, and distortion. Pictures below are an extract of tested scenes.

Samsung Galaxy A54 5G – Strong anamorphosis on the lateral edges, noise

Samsung Galaxy A53 5G – Moderate anamorphosis, noise

Motorola Moto G62 5G – Strong noise

Tele

Samsung Galaxy A54 5G

116

Honor Magic4 Ultimate

All image quality attributes are evaluated at focal lengths from approximately 40 mm to 300 mm, with particular attention paid to texture and detail. The score is derived from a number of objective measurements in the lab and perceptual analysis of real-life images.

DXOMARK CHART (DMC) detail preservation score per focal length

This graph shows the evolution of the DMC detail preservation score with respect to the full-frame equivalent focal length for different light conditions. The x-axis represents the equivalent focal length measured for each corresponding shooting distance and the y-axis represents the maximum details preservation metric score: higher value means better quality. Large dots correspond to zoom ratio available in the user interface of the camera application.

DXOMARK CHART (DMC) detail preservation score per focal length

Video

115

Samsung Galaxy A54 5G

149

Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max

About DXOMARK Camera Video tests

Learn more about how we test camera

Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Video scores

Exposure

Samsung Galaxy A54 5G

115

Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max

Color

Samsung Galaxy A54 5G

117

Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max

Exposure tests evaluate the brightness of the main subject and the dynamic range, eg. the ability to render visible details in both bright and dark areas of the image. Stability and temporal adaption of the exposure are also analyzed.
Image-quality color analysis looks at color rendering, skin-tone rendering, white balance, color shading, stability of the white balance and its adaption when light is changing.

Samsung Galaxy A54 5G

Samsung Galaxy A53 5G

Motorola Moto G62 5G

Texture

Samsung Galaxy A54 5G

115

Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra

Texture tests analyze the level of details and texture of the real-life videos as well as the videos of charts recorded in the lab. Natural videos recordings are visually evaluated, with particular attention paid to the level of details in the bright and areas as well as in the dark. Objective measurements are performed of images of charts taken in various conditions from 1 to 1000 lux. The charts used are the DXOMARK chart (DMC) and Dead Leaves chart.

DXOMARK CHART (DMC) detail preservation video score vs lux levels

Noise

110

Samsung Galaxy A54 5G

118

Samsung Galaxy A23 5G

Noise tests analyze various attributes of noise such as intensity, chromaticity, grain, structure, temporal aspects on real-life video recording as well as videos of charts taken in the lab. Natural videos are visually evaluated, with particular attention paid to the noise in the dark areas and high dynamic range conditions. Objective measurements are performed on the videos of charts recorded in various conditions from 1 to 1000 lux. The chart used is the DXOMARK visual noise chart.

Spatial Noise
Temporal Noise

Spatial visual noise evolution with the illuminance level

Temporal visual noise evolution with the illuminance level

This graph shows the evolution of temporal visual noise with the level of lux. Temporal visual noise is measured on the visual noise chart in the video noise setup.

Stabilization

102

Samsung Galaxy A54 5G

117

Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max

Stabilization evaluation tests the ability of the device to stabilize footage thanks to software or hardware technologies such as OIS, EIS, or any others means. The evaluation looks at residual motion, smoothness, jellow artifacts and residual motion blur on walk and run use cases in various lighting conditions. The video below is an extract from one of the tested scenes.

Samsung Galaxy A54 5G

Samsung Galaxy A53 5G

Motorola Moto G62 5G

Artifacts

Samsung Galaxy A54 5G

Xiaomi 12S Ultra

Artifacts are evaluated with MTF and ringing measurements on the SFR chart in the lab as well as frame-rate measurements using the LED Universal Timer. Natural videos are visually evaluated by paying particular attention to artifacts such as aliasing, quantization, blocking, and hue shift, among others. The more severe and the more frequent the artifact, the higher the point deduction from the score. The main artifacts and corresponding point loss are listed below.

Main video artifacts penalties

The post Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Camera test appeared first on DXOMARK.

Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Display test

DXOMARK — Mon, 20 Mar 2023 15:07:45 +0000

We put the Samsung Galaxy A54 5G through our rigorous DXOMARK Display test suite to measure its performance across six criteria. In this test results, we will break down how it fared in a variety of tests and several common use cases.

Overview

Key display specifications:

6.4 inches AMOLED, 109.8 cm2 (~85.0% screen-to-body ratio)
Dimensions: 158.2 mm x 76.7 mm x 8.2 mm
Resolution: 1080 x 2340 (FHD+) pixels, (~403 ppi density)
Aspect ratio: 19.5:9
Refresh rate: 120 Hz

Scoring

Sub-scores and attributes included in the calculations of the global score.

Samsung Galaxy A54 5G

120

display

Readability

117

160

Color

137

163

Video

127

162

Motion

134

155

Touch

144

165

Artifacts

158

Position in Global Ranking

83^rd

1. Honor Magic5 Pro

151

2. Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max

149

2. Apple iPhone 14 Pro

149

4. Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra (Snapdragon)

148

4. Samsung Galaxy S23 (Snapdragon)

148

6. Google Pixel 7 Pro

146

6. Samsung Galaxy S23 Plus (Snapdragon)

146

8. Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max

145

9. Apple iPhone 13 Pro

144

10. Huawei Mate 50 Pro

141

11. Apple iPhone 14 Plus

140

11. Google Pixel 7

140

11. Honor Magic4 Ultimate

140

11. Vivo X Fold

140

15. Apple iPhone 14

139

15. Oppo Find X5 Pro

139

17. Oppo Find X5

138

18. Apple iPhone 13

136

18. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Snapdragon)

136

18. Xiaomi 13 Pro

136

21. Huawei P50 Pro

135

21. Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Exynos)

135

21. Xiaomi 13

135

24. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4

134

24. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos)

134

24. Vivo X80 Pro (MediaTek)

134

27. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4

133

27. Samsung Galaxy S22 (Snapdragon)

133

27. Samsung Galaxy S22 (Exynos)

133

27. Vivo X80 Pro (Snapdragon)

133

31. Vivo X70 Pro+

132

32. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Snapdragon)

131

32. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Exynos)

131

32. Sony Xperia 5 IV

131

32. Xiaomi 12T

131

36. Apple iPhone 13 mini

130

36. Google Pixel 6 Pro

130

36. Honor Magic4 Pro

130

36. Oppo Find N2 Flip

130

36. Realme GT 2 Pro

130

36. Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G (Snapdragon)

130

42. OnePlus 10 Pro

129

42. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G

129

42. Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra 5G (Snapdragon)

129

42. TCL 20 Pro 5G

129

42. Vivo X60 Pro+

129

42. Xiaomi 11T

129

48. Asus ROG Phone 6

128

48. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G

128

48. Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra 5G (Exynos)

128

51. Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max

127

51. OnePlus 9 Pro

127

51. OnePlus 8T

127

51. Xiaomi 12T Pro

127

55. Oppo Find X3 Pro

126

55. Sony Xperia 1 IV

126

57. Google Pixel 6a

125

57. Google Pixel 6

125

57. LG Wing

125

57. OnePlus 9

125

57. OnePlus 8 Pro

125

57. Vivo X70 Pro (MediaTek)

125

57. Vivo X60 Pro 5G (Snapdragon)

125

57. Vivo iQOO 9 Pro

125

57. Xiaomi 12S Ultra

125

57. Xiaomi 11T Pro

125

67. Honor 70

124

67. Oppo Reno8 5G

124

67. Oppo Find N

124

67. Sony Xperia 5 III

124

67. Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra

124

67. Xiaomi Mi 11

124

73. Apple iPhone 12 Pro

123

73. Oppo Reno6 Pro 5G (Snapdragon)

123

73. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G (Exynos)

123

73. Vivo X51 5G

123

77. Apple iPhone SE (2022)

122

77. Motorola Edge 30 Pro

122

77. Oppo Reno8 Pro 5G

122

77. Oppo Find X3 Neo

122

77. Sony Xperia 1 III

122

77. Xiaomi 12 Pro

122

83. Apple iPhone 12

120

83. Huawei P40 Pro

120

83. Samsung Galaxy A54 5G

120

86. Realme GT 5G

118

86. Xiaomi 12

118

88. Oppo Reno5 Pro+ 5G

117

88. Vivo iQOO 7 Legend

117

88. Xiaomi Mi 11i

117

91. Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max

116

91. Asus ROG Phone 5

116

93. Oppo Reno5 Pro 5G

114

94. Asus Zenfone 8

113

95. Oppo Reno6 5G

112

96. Motorola Edge 20 Pro

111

96. Oppo Find X3 Lite

111

96. Realme GT Neo 2 5G

111

96. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G

111

100. Oppo Find X5 Lite

110

100. Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G

110

102. Lenovo Legion Y90

109

102. OnePlus Nord 2 5G

109

104. Sony Xperia 5 II

108

105. POCO F4 GT

107

105. Xiaomi Redmi K50 Gaming

107

107. Nubia RedMagic 6 Pro

105

108. Samsung Galaxy A53 5G

104

108. ZTE Axon 30 Ultra

104

110. Oppo Find X2 Pro

103

111. Google Pixel 5

101

112. Google Pixel 4 XL

100

112. Sony Xperia 10 IV

100

114. Microsoft Surface Duo

115. Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra

116. Nubia RedMagic 7 Pro

117. Black Shark 4S Pro

117. Black Shark 4 Pro

117. Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro 5G

120. Black Shark 5 Pro

120. Vivo X80 Lite 5G

122. Asus ROG Phone 3

123. Fairphone 4

124. Crosscall Action-X5

125. Samsung Galaxy A22 5G

126. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro

127. Nokia 8.3 5G

128. Lenovo Legion Phone 2 Pro

129. Samsung Galaxy A12

130. Realme C21

Position in High-End Ranking

11^th

1. Google Pixel 7

140

2. Xiaomi 12T

131

3. TCL 20 Pro 5G

129

3. Xiaomi 11T

129

5. OnePlus 8T

127

6. Google Pixel 6a

125

6. Google Pixel 6

125

8. Honor 70

124

8. Oppo Reno8 5G

124

10. Apple iPhone SE (2022)

122

11. Samsung Galaxy A54 5G

120

12. Realme GT 5G

118

13. Vivo iQOO 7 Legend

117

14. Oppo Reno5 Pro 5G

114

15. Oppo Reno6 5G

112

16. Oppo Find X3 Lite

111

16. Realme GT Neo 2 5G

111

16. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G

111

19. Oppo Find X5 Lite

110

19. Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G

110

21. POCO F4 GT

107

21. Xiaomi Redmi K50 Gaming

107

23. Samsung Galaxy A53 5G

104

24. Sony Xperia 10 IV

100

25. Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro 5G

26. Vivo X80 Lite 5G

27. Fairphone 4

28. Crosscall Action-X5

Pros

Accurate and reactive touch when playing videos games
When viewing HDR10 videos, midtones are well rendered, allowing to see more details
Well-managed frame drops when playing videos games

Cons

High Brightness Mode affects the picture rendering, with skin tones appearing flat and the presence of a strong yellow/green cast on the screen
When viewing at an angle, the screen becomes iridescent, showing pink to green casts
Aliasing when playing videos games

The Samsung Galaxy A54 5G’s display performance was very average. The device’s highlight was watching HDR10 videos on its screen because of the good color rendering, particularly the midtones, which emphasized details. However, it was not possible to view Ultra-High Definition (UHD) 60 fps content on this device.

The device’s High Brightness Mode performance indicated that that feature could use some tuning. When the device was used outdoors, the screen image would be affected by color casts and inconsistencies in image rendering.

Test summary

About DXOMARK Display tests: For scoring and analysis in our smartphone and other display reviews, DXOMARK engineers perform a variety of objective and perceptual tests under controlled lab and real-life conditions. Note that we evaluate display attributes using only the device’s built-in display hardware and its still image (gallery) and video apps at their default settings. (For in-depth information about how we evaluate smartphone and other displays, check out our articles, “How DXOMARK tests display quality” and “A closer look at DXOMARK Display testing.”

Readability

117

Samsung Galaxy A54 5G

160

Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max

How Display Readability score is composed

Readability evaluates how easily and comfortably users can read still content (photos & web) on the display under different real-life conditions. DXOMARK uses its Display Bench to recreate ambient light conditions ranging from total darkness to bright sunlight. In addition to laboratory tests, perceptual analysis is also made in real-life environments.

Learn more about how we test display readability

Brightness under various lighting conditions

Contrast under various lighting conditions

Readability in an indoor (1000 lux) environment

From left: Samsung Galaxy A54 5G, Samsung A53 5G, Google Pixel 6a, Xiaomi 12T

(Photos for illustration only)

Readability in a sunlight (>90 000 lux) environment

From left: Samsung Galaxy A54 5G, Samsung A53 5G, Google Pixel 6a, Xiaomi 12T

(Photos for illustration only)

Luminance uniformity measurement

This graph shows the uniformity of the display with a 20% gray pattern. The more visible the green color, the more uniform the display.

Color

137

Samsung Galaxy A54 5G

163

Huawei Mate 50 Pro

How Display Color score is composed

The color attribute evaluates the capacity of the device to accurately reproduce colors. The measurements taken are for fidelity, white point color, and gamut coverage. We perform color evaluations for different lighting conditions to see how well the device can manage color in the surrounding environment. Colors are measured using a spectrophotometer in a controlled lighting environment. Perceptual analysis of color rendering is against the reference pattern displayed on a calibrated professional monitor.

Learn more about how we test display color

White point under D65 illuminant at 1000 lux

Color fidelity measurements

Samsung Galaxy A54 5G, color fidelity at 1000 lux in the sRGB color space

Samsung Galaxy A54 5G, color fidelity at 1000 lux in the Display-P3 color space

Each arrow represents the color difference between a target color pattern (base of the arrow) and its actual measurement (tip of the arrow). The longer the arrow, the more visible the color difference is. If the arrow stays within the circle, the color difference will be visible only to trained eyes.

Color behavior on angle

This graph shows the color shift when the screen is at an angle. Each dot represents a measurement at a particular angle. Dots inside the inner circle exhibit no color shift in angle; those between the inner and outer circle have shifts that only trained experts will see; but those falling outside the outer circle are noticeable.

Video

127

Samsung Galaxy A54 5G

162

Samsung Galaxy S23 (Snapdragon)

How Display Video score is composed

Our video attribute evaluates the Standard Dynamic Range (SDR) and High Dynamic Range (HDR10) video handling of each device in indoor and low-light conditions. We measure tone mapping, color gamut, brightness and contrast of the display. We perform perceptual analysis against our professional reference monitor (Sony BVM-HX310) to ensure that the rendering respects the artistic intent.

Learn more about how we test display video

Video brightness at 10% APL in the dark ( < 5 lux)

Video rendering in a low-light (0 lux) environment

Clockwise from top left: Samsung Galaxy A54 5G, Google Pixel 6a, Xiaomi 12T

(Photos for illustration only)

Gamut coverage for video content

HDR10 Gamut coverage

SDR Gamut coverage

The primary colors are measured both in HDR10 and SDR. The extracted color gamut shows the extent of the color area that the device can render. To respect the artistic intent, the measured gamut should match the master color space of each video.

Motion

134

Samsung Galaxy A54 5G

155

Huawei P40 Pro

How Display Motion score is composed

The motion attribute evaluates the handling of dynamic contents. Frame drops, motion blur, and playback artifacts are scrutinized using games and videos.

Learn more about how we test display motion

Video frame drops

30 fps content

60 fps content

These long exposure photos present the number of frame irregularities in a 30-second video. A good performance shows a regular pattern (either a flat gray image or a pull-down pattern).

Touch

144

Samsung Galaxy A54 5G

165

OnePlus 9

How Display Touch score is composed

To evaluate touch, DXOMARK uses a touch robot and a high-speed camera to play and record a set of scenarios for smoothness, accuracy and response-time evaluation.

Learn more about how we test display touch

Average Touch Response Time Samsung Galaxy A54 5G

59 ms

Fast

Good

Bad

Slow

This response time test evaluates precisely the time elapsed between a single touch of the robot on the screen and the displayed action. This test is applied to activities that require a high reactivity, such as gaming.

Artifacts

Samsung Galaxy A54 5G

158

Vivo X Fold

How Display Artifacts score is composed

Evaluating artifacts means checking for the performance, image rendering and motion flaws that can affect the end-user experience. DXOMARK measures precisely the device’s reflectance and the presence of flicker, and assesses the impact of residual aliasing when playing video games, among other characteristics.

Learn more about how we test display motion

Average Reflectance (SCI) Samsung Galaxy A54 5G

5.2 %

Low

Good

Bad

High

Reflectance measurement (SCI)

Measurements above show the reflection of the device within the visible spectrum range (400 nm to 700 nm). It includes both diffuse and specular reflection.

Flicker Frequency Samsung Galaxy A54 5G

240 Hz

Bad

Good

Bad

Great

Flicker comparison

This graph represents the frequencies of lighting variation; the highest peak gives the main flicker frequency.

Aliasing (closeup)

Samsung Galaxy A54 5G

(Photos for illustration only)

Samsung Galaxy A54 5G – Crop1

Samsung Galaxy A54 5G – Crop 2

Samsung Galaxy A54 5G – Crop3

The post Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Display test appeared first on DXOMARK.

Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Audio test

DXOMARK — Mon, 20 Mar 2023 15:03:38 +0000

We put the Samsung Galaxy A54 5G through our rigorous DXOMARK Audio test suite to measure its performance both at recording sound using its built-in microphones, and at playing audio back through its speakers.

In this review, we will break down how it fared in a variety of tests and several common use cases.

Overview

Key audio specifications include:

Two speakers (Top front, bottom side)
No jack audio output

Scoring

Sub-scores and attributes included in the calculations of the global score.

Samsung Galaxy A54 5G

133

audio

132
playback

Timbre

129

158

Dynamics

130

149

Spatial

143

162

Volume

124

162

Artifacts

157

135
recording

Timbre

133

147

Dynamics

131

146

Spatial

108

159

Volume

124

170

Artifacts

142

145

Background

120

166

Position in Global Ranking

34^th

1. Black Shark 5 Pro

161

2. Asus ROG Phone 6

155

3. Asus ROG Phone 5

151

4. Asus Smartphone for Snapdragon Insiders

149

4. Black Shark 4S Pro

149

4. Black Shark 4 Pro

149

4. Honor Magic3 Pro+

149

8. Xiaomi Mi 10 S

147

9. Huawei Mate 50 Pro

144

9. Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro

144

11. Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max

142

11. Apple iPhone 14 Pro

142

13. Apple iPhone 14 Plus

141

13. Apple iPhone 14

141

15. Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max

140

15. Apple iPhone 12

140

15. Xiaomi 13 Pro

140

18. Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max

139

18. Apple iPhone 13 Pro

139

18. Apple iPhone 12 mini

139

18. Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra (Snapdragon)

139

22. Apple iPhone 13

138

22. Asus ROG Phone 3

138

22. Google Pixel 6 Pro

138

25. Apple iPhone 13 mini

137

25. Google Pixel 7 Pro

137

25. Google Pixel 6

137

25. Honor Magic4 Pro

137

25. Samsung Galaxy S23 Plus (Snapdragon)

137

30. Google Pixel 6a

135

30. Oppo Find N2

135

32. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4

134

32. Xiaomi 13

134

34. Huawei Mate 20 X

133

34. Lenovo Legion Y90

133

34. Samsung Galaxy S23 (Snapdragon)

133

34. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Snapdragon)

133

34. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos)

133

34. Samsung Galaxy A54 5G

133

34. Vivo X90 Pro

133

41. Vivo X Fold

132

41. Vivo X90 Pro+

132

43. Apple iPhone XS Max

131

43. Oppo Find X2 Pro

131

43. Oppo Find N2 Flip

131

46. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4

130

47. Vivo X80 Pro (Snapdragon)

129

47. Xiaomi 12S Ultra

129

47. Xiaomi 12 Pro

129

50. OnePlus 11

128

50. Oppo Find X5 Pro

128

50. POCO F4 GT

128

50. Xiaomi Redmi K50 Gaming

128

50. Xiaomi 11T Pro

128

55. Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G

127

55. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G

127

55. Xiaomi 12T Pro

127

58. Apple iPhone 11

126

58. OnePlus 10T 5G

126

58. Samsung Galaxy A53 5G

126

58. Xiaomi 12T

126

58. Xiaomi 11T

126

63. Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max

125

63. Samsung Galaxy A33 5G

125

63. Vivo X80 Pro (MediaTek)

125

66. Lenovo Legion Phone 2 Pro

124

67. Google Pixel 7

123

67. Oppo Reno8 Pro 5G

123

69. Apple iPhone SE (2022)

122

69. Apple iPhone SE (2020)

122

69. Xiaomi 12

122

72. OnePlus 9 Pro

121

72. Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Exynos)

121

72. Sony Xperia 1 IV

121

72. Xiaomi Mix Fold 2

121

76. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G

120

76. Samsung Galaxy S22 (Snapdragon)

120

76. Samsung Galaxy S22 (Exynos)

120

79. Asus ROG Phone 2

119

79. Huawei P50 Pro

119

79. OnePlus 9

119

79. OnePlus 8

119

79. Xiaomi Redmi K40 Gaming

119

79. Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra

119

85. Realme GT Neo 3

118

85. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Snapdragon)

118

85. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Exynos)

118

85. Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G (Snapdragon)

118

85. Samsung Galaxy S21 5G (Snapdragon)

118

85. Samsung Galaxy S21 5G (Exynos)

118

91. Asus Zenfone 8

117

91. Google Pixel 4

117

91. OnePlus 10 Pro

117

91. OnePlus 8 Pro

117

91. Vivo iQOO 9 Pro

117

96. Motorola Edge+

116

96. Realme GT Neo 2 5G

116

96. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G (Exynos)

116

96. Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra 5G (Exynos)

116

96. Xiaomi Redmi K40 Pro+

116

96. Xiaomi Mi 11

116

102. Motorola Edge 30 Pro

115

102. OnePlus Nord 2T 5G

115

102. Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra 5G (Snapdragon)

115

102. Xiaomi Mi 11i

115

106. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold2 5G

114

106. Vivo iQOO 7 Legend

114

108. Google Pixel 5

113

108. LG V60 ThinQ 5G

113

108. OnePlus 7 Pro

113

108. Samsung Galaxy S20+

113

108. Samsung Galaxy S10+

113

108. Samsung Galaxy Note 10+ 5G (Exynos)

113

108. Samsung Galaxy Note 10+ (Exynos)

113

108. Sony Xperia 1 III

113

116. Nubia RedMagic 6 Pro

112

116. Nubia Red Magic 5S

112

116. Realme GT 5G

112

116. Xiaomi 12 Lite 5G

112

120. Sony Xperia 5 IV

111

121. Oppo Find X3 Pro

110

122. Honor 70

109

122. Huawei Mate 30 Pro 5G

109

122. Oppo Find X5

109

122. POCO X3 NFC

109

122. Realme GT 2 Pro

109

122. Vivo X70 Pro+

109

122. ZTE Axon 30 Ultra

109

129. Huawei Mate 30 Pro

108

129. Oppo Reno6 Pro 5G (Snapdragon)

108

129. Oppo Find X3 Neo

108

129. Realme X2 Pro

108

133. Nothing Phone(1)

106

133. Oppo Reno8 Lite 5G

106

133. Oppo A77 5G

106

136. Lenovo Legion Phone Pro

105

136. Nubia RedMagic 7 Pro

105

136. Samsung Galaxy A23 5G

105

139. Honor V30 Pro

104

139. Oppo Reno8 5G

104

139. Oppo Reno5 Pro+ 5G

104

142. Black Shark 3 Pro

103

142. Oppo Find X5 Lite

103

142. Sony Xperia 1 II

103

145. Huawei P40 Pro

102

145. Motorola Edge 20 Pro

102

145. Oppo Reno6 5G

102

148. Motorola Razr

101

149. Xiaomi Mi CC9 Pro Premium Edition

150. Black Shark 2 Pro

150. Honor 20 Pro

150. Oppo Find X3 Lite

150. Vivo X51 5G

154. LG G8 ThinQ

154. Sony Xperia 10 IV

156. Nubia Red Magic 3S

157. Fairphone 4

157. Sony Xperia 1

157. Vivo X70 Pro (MediaTek)

160. Vivo X60 Pro+

161. Nokia 7.2

162. Vivo X60 Pro 5G (Snapdragon)

Position in High-End Ranking

4^th

1. Xiaomi Mi 10 S

147

2. Google Pixel 6

137

3. Google Pixel 6a

135

4. Samsung Galaxy A54 5G

133

5. POCO F4 GT

128

5. Xiaomi Redmi K50 Gaming

128

7. Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G

127

7. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G

127

9. Samsung Galaxy A53 5G

126

9. Xiaomi 12T

126

9. Xiaomi 11T

126

12. Google Pixel 7

123

13. Apple iPhone SE (2022)

122

14. Realme GT Neo 2 5G

116

14. Xiaomi Redmi K40 Pro+

116

16. Vivo iQOO 7 Legend

114

17. Nubia Red Magic 5S

112

17. Realme GT 5G

112

17. Xiaomi 12 Lite 5G

112

20. Honor 70

109

21. Nothing Phone(1)

106

21. Oppo Reno8 Lite 5G

106

23. Oppo Reno8 5G

104

24. Oppo Find X5 Lite

103

25. Oppo Reno6 5G

102

26. Black Shark 2 Pro

26. Honor 20 Pro

26. Oppo Find X3 Lite

29. Sony Xperia 10 IV

30. Nubia Red Magic 3S

31. Fairphone 4

Playback

Pros

Pretty solid performance across all test attributes
Strong punch regardless of volume
Natural and pleasant bass rendition

Cons

Performance too volume-dependent
Tinny resonance and harshness
Underwhelming depth rendition

Recording

Pros

Good performance overall in all use cases and attributes
Pleasant tonal balance, consistent across all use cases
Pretty much free of artifacts

Cons

No audio zoom
Sub-bass too intrusive at high sound pressure levels, as well as in the background of urban scenarios
Poor signal-to-noise ratio in loud environments, main signal can get drowned out

With an overall score of 133, the Samsung Galaxy A54 5G did well in our DXOMARK Audio tests for a device in its class, but left some room for improvement. Overall audio quality has improved over its predecessors in the A-series, with consistent performance across use cases in both playback and recording. Playback through the built-in speakers sounded punchy with nice bass, but it could become a little harsh at high volume settings. A54 audio recordings offered a pleasant tonal balance and were almost free of unwanted artifacts. However, wind or loud background noises could have a detrimental effect on recording quality, reducing intelligibility quite noticeably. Overall recording results were best with the main camera, but performances with the front camera and memo app were decent as well.

Test summary

About DXOMARK Audio tests: For scoring and analysis in our smartphone audio reviews, DXOMARK engineers perform a variety of objective tests and undertake more than 20 hours of perceptual evaluation under controlled lab conditions.
(For more details about our Playback protocol, click here; for more details about our Recording protocol, click here.)
The following section gathers key elements of our exhaustive tests and analyses performed in DXOMARK laboratories. Detailed performance evaluations under the form of reports are available upon request. Do not hesitate to contact us.

Playback

132

Samsung Galaxy A54 5G

163

Black Shark 5 Pro

How Audio Playback score is composed

DXOMARK engineers test playback through the smartphone speakers, whose performance is evaluated in our labs and in real-life conditions, using default apps and settings.

Learn more about how we test audio playback

The Samsung Galaxy A54 5G is a solid smartphone for audio playback. Timbre was good, with a richer and bulkier tonal balance than the predecessors. Bass was pleasantly warm but lacked some depth in the low-end. Midrange sounded pleasant overall and while treble slightly lacked high-end extension, it offered sufficient brightness. Dynamics performance was good, too, thanks to pretty sharp attack, quite good but slightly inconsistent bass precision and very good punch.

The built-in speakers generated a pretty good stereo wideness and offered good localizability of individual sound sources in the audio scene. Distance rendition was mostly accurate, but depth rendition was insufficient, with a slightly shallow sound scene. Maximum volume was average, but the minimum volume step was slightly too quiet, making it difficult to hear soft sections in dynamic audio content. On the plus side, volume steps were consistent from the lowest to the highest setting. The Samsung did overall well at keeping unwanted audio artifacts under control, but at maximum volume, excessive compression and pumping as well as harsh global compression was noticed. Our experts also found it too easy to accidentally occlude the right speaker when holding the phone comfortably.

Listen to the tested smartphone’s playback performance in this comparison with some of its competitors:

Samsung Galaxy A54 5G

Google Pixel 7

Xiaomi 12T

Recordings of the smartphones playing some of our music tracks at 60 LAeq in an anechoic environment by 2 microphones in A-B configuration, at 30 cm

Here is how the Samsung Galaxy A54 5G performs in playback use cases compared to its competitors:

Playback use-cases scores

Timbre

129

Samsung Galaxy A54 5G

158

Black Shark 5 Pro

The Timbre score represents how well a phone reproduces sound across the audible tonal range and takes into account bass, midrange, treble, tonal balance, and volume dependency. It is the most important attribute for playback.

Music playback frequency response

A 1/12 octave frequency response graph, which measures the volume of each frequency emitted by the smartphone when playing a pure-sine wave in an anechoic environment.

Dynamics

130

Samsung Galaxy A54 5G

149

Black Shark 5 Pro

The Dynamics score measures the accuracy of changes in the energy level of sound sources, for example how precisely a bass note is reproduced or the impact sound from drums.

Spatial

143

Samsung Galaxy A54 5G

162

Black Shark 5 Pro

The sub-attributes for spatial tests include pinpointing a specific sound's location, its positional balance, distance, and wideness.

Volume

124

Samsung Galaxy A54 5G

162

Black Shark 5 Pro

The Volume score represents the overall loudness of a smartphone and how smoothly volume increases and decreases based on user input.

Here are a few sound pressure levels (SPL) measured when playing our sample recordings of hip-hop and classical music at maximum volume:

	Hip-Hop	Classical
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G	75 dBA	71.3 dBA
Google Pixel 7	71.8 dBA	72.9 dBA
Xiaomi 12T	74.8 dBA	69.4 dBA

The following graph shows the gradual changes in volume going from minimum to maximum. We expect these changes to be consistent across the range, so that all volume steps correspond to users’ expectations:

Music volume consistency

This line graph shows the relative loudness of playback relative to the user selected volume step, measured at different volume steps with a correlated pink noise in an anechoic box recorded in axis at 0.20 meter.

Artifacts

Samsung Galaxy A54 5G

157

Asus ROG Phone 5

The Artifacts score measures the extent to which the sound is affected by various types of distortion. The higher the score, the less the disturbances in the sound are noticeable. Distortion can occur because of sound processing in the device and because of the quality of the speakers.

Playback Total Harmonic Distortion (Maximum Volume)

This graph shows the Total Harmonic Distortion and Noise over the hearable frequency range.
It represents the distortion and noise of the device playing our test signal (0 dB Fs, Sweep Sine in an anechoic box at 40 cm) at the device's maximum volume.

Recording

135

Samsung Galaxy A54 5G

157

Black Shark 5 Pro

How Audio Recording score is composed

DXOMARK engineers test recording by evaluating the recorded files on reference audio equipment. Those recordings are done in our labs and in real-life conditions, using default apps and settings.

Learn more about how we test audio recording

As a recording device, the Galaxy A54 5G did well across all use cases. Timbre was well-balanced when recording with the main camera, which recorded voice-based content with good intelligibility, thanks to a natural and clean midrange. Tonal balance remained consistent with the front camera while in the memo app, more emphasis was put on the upper midrange. Recording dynamics were good overall, thanks to a fairly good signal-to-noise ratio in urban scenarios, even though background could be quite intrusive. Envelope was accurate, with sharp attack in most use cases.

Main camera recordings offered a large and immersive audio scene rendition and precise localizability. However, with the front camera and in the memo app, the sound stage rendition was quite narrow, and audio sources were more difficult to pinpoint precisely. On the plus side, distance rendition was realistic. The device offered good recording loudness across all use cases and was almost free of unwanted audio artifacts. Our experts only noticed some slight distortion when recording louder sources, such as shouting voices. Background rendition was realistic with the main camera but slightly boomy with a more intrusive bass when recording with the front camera.

Here is how the Samsung Galaxy A54 5G performs in recording use cases compared to its competitors:

Recording use-cases scores

Timbre

133

Samsung Galaxy A54 5G

147

Honor Magic3 Pro+

The Timbre score represents how well a phone captures sounds across the audible tonal range and takes into account bass, midrange, treble, and tonal balance. It is the most important attribute for recording.

Life video frequency response

A 1/12 octave frequency response graph, which measures the volume of each frequency captured by the smartphone when recording a pure-sine wave in an anechoic environment.

Dynamics

131

Samsung Galaxy A54 5G

146

Black Shark 5 Pro

The Dynamics score measures the accuracy of changes in the energy level of sound sources, for example how precisely a voice's plosives (the p's, t's and k's, for example) are reproduced. The score also considers the Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR), for example how loud the main voice is compared to the background noise.

Spatial

108

Samsung Galaxy A54 5G

159

Vivo X Fold

The sub-attributes for spatial tests include pinpointing a specific sound's location, its positional balance, distance, and wideness on the recorded audio files.

Recording directivity

Directivity graph of the smartphone when recording test signals using the camera app, with the main camera. It represents the acoustic energy (in dB) over the angle of incidence of the sound source. (Normalized to the angle 0°, in front of the device.)

Volume

124

Samsung Galaxy A54 5G

170

Black Shark 5 Pro

The Volume score represents how loud audio is normalized on the recorded files and the how the device handles loud environments, such as electronic concerts, when recording.

Here are the sound levels recorded in the audio and video files, measured in LUFS (Loudness Unit Full Scale); as a reference, we expect loudness levels to be above -24 LUFS for recorded content:

	Meeting	Life Video	Selfie Video	Memo
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G	-25.8 LUFS	-22.2 LUFS	-20.9 LUFS	-21.1 LUFS
Google Pixel 7	-29.4 LUFS	-19.4 LUFS	-17 LUFS	-23 LUFS
Xiaomi 12T	-27.9 LUFS	-21.3 LUFS	-19.5 LUFS	-21.4 LUFS

Artifacts

142

Samsung Galaxy A54 5G

145

Black Shark 5 Pro

The Artifacts score measures the extent to which the recorded sounds are affected by various types of distortions. The higher the score, the less the disturbances in the sound are noticeable. Distortions can occur because of sound processing in the device and the quality of the microphones, as well as user handling, such as how the phone is held.

In this audio comparison, you can listen to the way this smartphone handles wind noise relative to its competitors:

Recordings of a voice sample with light background noise, facing a turbulent wind of 5 m/s

Background

120

Samsung Galaxy A54 5G

166

Black Shark 5 Pro

Background evaluates how natural the various sounds around a voice blend into the video recording file. For example, when recording a speech at an event, the background should not interfere with the main voice, yet it should provide some context of the surroundings.

The post Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Audio test appeared first on DXOMARK.

Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Battery

DXOMARK — Mon, 20 Mar 2023 15:02:35 +0000

We put the Samsung Galaxy A54 5G through our rigorous DXOMARK Battery test suite to measure its performance in autonomy, charging and efficiency. In these test results, we will break down how it fared in a variety of tests and several common use cases.

Overview

Key specifications:

Battery capacity: 5000 mAh
25W charger (not included)
6.4-inch, 1080 x 2340 (FHD+), 120 Hz, OLED display
Exynos 1380 (5 nm)
Tested ROM / RAM combination: 128 GB + 8 GB

Scoring

Sub-scores and attributes included in the calculations of the global score.

Samsung Galaxy A54 5G

113

battery

122
autonomy

Home/Office

129

213

On the go

130

195

Calibrated

109

198

108
charging

Full charge

103

184

Quick boost

114

182

98
efficiency

Charge up

112

205

Discharge

194

Key performances

2 days 12h

Battery life

0h52

80% Charging time

1h40

Full charging time

3h20 autonomy

after 5-minute charge

Position in Global Ranking

72^nd

1. Honor Magic5 Lite 5G

152

2. Honor X7a

147

3. Oppo Reno6 5G

146

4. Realme GT Neo 2 5G

144

5. Honor X9a

143

6. Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra (Snapdragon)

142

7. Oppo Reno8 5G

141

8. Asus ROG Phone 6

140

9. Oppo Reno8 Lite 5G

139

10. Oppo A77 5G

138

10. Sony Xperia 10 IV

138

12. Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max

136

12. OnePlus Nord CE 5G

136

12. Samsung Galaxy M51

136

12. Vivo Y72 5G

136

12. Vivo X80 Lite 5G

136

12. Xiaomi 11T

136

18. Honor Magic4 Lite 5G

135

18. Oppo Find X5 Lite

135

20. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G

134

20. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10

134

22. Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max

133

22. Oppo A74

133

22. Vivo Y76 5G

133

22. Vivo X60 Pro 5G (Snapdragon)

133

22. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S 5G

133

27. Honor X8 5G

132

27. Oppo A78 5G

132

27. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S

132

30. Samsung Galaxy A72

131

30. Wiko Power U30

131

32. Oppo Reno6 Pro 5G (Snapdragon)

130

33. Realme GT Neo 3

129

33. Samsung Galaxy A34 5G

129

33. Samsung Galaxy A23 5G

129

33. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro

129

37. Apple iPhone 14 Plus

128

37. OnePlus Nord 2 5G

128

37. Xiaomi 13

128

40. Nubia RedMagic 6 Pro

127

40. Oppo A94 5G

127

42. Honor 70

126

42. OnePlus 10T 5G

126

42. Oppo Find X3 Neo

126

42. Xiaomi 13 Pro

126

42. Xiaomi 11T Pro

126

47. Samsung Galaxy A13 5G

125

48. Huawei P50 Pro

123

48. Xiaomi 12T Pro

123

50. OnePlus 9

122

51. Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max

121

51. Oppo A74 5G

121

53. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G

120

54. Apple iPhone 14 Pro

119

54. Nothing Phone(1)

119

54. Oppo A54 5G

119

54. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11

119

58. Apple iPhone 13 Pro

118

58. Motorola Edge 20 Pro

118

58. Nubia RedMagic 7 Pro

118

58. Xiaomi 12T

118

58. Xiaomi 12 Lite 5G

118

63. Realme GT 2 Pro

117

64. Honor X7

116

64. Oppo Find X5 Pro

116

64. Vivo Y20s

116

67. Apple iPhone 13

115

67. Oppo Reno8 Pro 5G

115

67. Realme GT 5G

115

70. Huawei P40 Lite

114

70. Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro 5G

114

72. Samsung Galaxy A54 5G

113

72. Sony Xperia 5 IV

113

74. Apple iPhone 14

112

74. Motorola Moto G62 5G

112

74. OnePlus Nord 2T 5G

112

74. OnePlus 8T

112

78. Motorola Moto G9 Power

111

78. Oppo Find X5

111

78. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Snapdragon)

111

81. Wiko Power U20

110

82. Oppo Find X3 Lite

109

83. Samsung Galaxy S21 5G (Snapdragon)

108

83. Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra

108

85. Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G

107

86. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G

106

87. Black Shark 5 Pro

105

87. Oppo Find X3 Pro

105

89. OnePlus 9 Pro

104

90. Huawei Mate 50 Pro

103

90. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Snapdragon)

103

92. Asus Zenfone 8 Flip

102

92. Asus Zenfone 8

102

92. Google Pixel 7 Pro

102

95. OnePlus 10 Pro

100

95. POCO F4 GT

100

95. Samsung Galaxy S21 5G (Exynos)

100

95. Xiaomi Redmi 10 2022

100

95. Xiaomi 12

100

100. Apple iPhone 13 mini

100. Realme C21

100. Realme C11

100. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4

100. Vivo X80 Pro (Snapdragon)

105. Google Pixel 7

105. Motorola Edge 30 Pro

105. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos)

108. Google Pixel 6

109. Samsung Galaxy A33 5G

109. Vivo X51 5G

111. Honor Magic4 Pro

111. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4

111. Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Exynos)

111. Samsung Galaxy A53 5G

115. Google Pixel 6a

116. Apple iPhone 12 mini

116. Google Pixel 5

116. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Exynos)

119. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G

120. Samsung Galaxy S22 (Snapdragon)

121. Xiaomi Redmi 9

122. Sony Xperia 1 IV

123. Apple iPhone SE (2022)

124. Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G (Snapdragon)

124. Xiaomi Mi 11

126. Google Pixel 6 Pro

127. Xiaomi 12 Pro

128. Samsung Galaxy S22 (Exynos)

Position in High-End Ranking

16^th

1. Oppo Reno6 5G

146

2. Realme GT Neo 2 5G

144

3. Oppo Reno8 5G

141

4. Oppo Reno8 Lite 5G

139

5. Sony Xperia 10 IV

138

6. Vivo X80 Lite 5G

136

6. Xiaomi 11T

136

8. Oppo Find X5 Lite

135

9. Samsung Galaxy A72

131

10. Honor 70

126

11. Nothing Phone(1)

119

12. Xiaomi 12T

118

12. Xiaomi 12 Lite 5G

118

14. Realme GT 5G

115

15. Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro 5G

114

16. Samsung Galaxy A54 5G

113

17. OnePlus 8T

112

18. Oppo Find X3 Lite

109

19. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G

106

20. POCO F4 GT

100

21. Google Pixel 7

22. Google Pixel 6

23. Samsung Galaxy A53 5G

24. Google Pixel 6a

25. Apple iPhone SE (2022)

Pros

Good autonomy when used moderately
Very good autonomy when using the GPS on the go
Very low residual consumption of the charger when the device is fully charged, whether or not plugged in

Cons

Poor autonomy when streaming music
Low autonomy gained after a quick 5-minute charge
Poor charge efficiency

The Samsung Galaxy A54 5G struggled in some of our battery tests, resulting in an overall score that was just below our database average, but still much better than its predecessor.

The autonomy performances were quite good, with the 5000 mAh battery lasting 2.5 days when used moderately. When testing on-the-go and individual usages, the performances were average. However, the Galaxy A54 5G showed very good autonomy when using the GPS outdoors, but poor results when listening to music.

The charging experience of the Samsung Galaxy A54 5G was limited by its 25W charger. Even if the charging power surpassed this 25W, the charging time was slightly below average at only 1 hour and 40 minutes. The autonomy recovered after a quick 5-minute charge was also low, which contributed to its below-average score.

The A54 5G’s efficiency was weak, mainly due to poor charge efficiency. The discharge currents were average overall, except for navigation, which was good, but poor for music streaming, indicating that the device is not perfectly optimized.

Compared with other devices from the High-End segment, the Samsung Galaxy A54 5G still ranked below average. Its slightly above-average autonomy in this segment was offset by its poor charging experience and a low efficiency score.

Test Summary

	Battery	Charger	Wireless	Display	Processor
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G	5000mAh	25W (not included)	-	AMOLED 1080 x 2400	Exynos 1380
Samsung Galaxy A53 5G	5000mAh	25W (not included)	-	AMOLED 1080 x 2400	Samsung Exynos 1280
Xiaomi 12T	5000mAh	120W (not included)	-	AMOLED 1220 x 2712	Mediatek Dimensity 8100-Ultra

Autonomy

122

Samsung Galaxy A54 5G

188

Honor X7a

How Autonomy score is composed

Learn more about how we test battery

86h

Light Usage

Active: 2h30/day

60h

Moderate Usage

Active: 4h/day

38h

Intense Usage

Active: 7h/day

Position in Global Ranking
Battery Life (moderate)

38^th

1. Honor X7a

86h

2. Vivo Y72 5G

85h

3. Wiko Power U30

80h

4. Sony Xperia 10 IV

80h

5. Oppo A77 5G

76h

6. Honor X8 5G

74h

7. Honor Magic5 Lite 5G

74h

8. Samsung Galaxy M51

73h

9. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S 5G

72h

10. Asus ROG Phone 6

72h

11. Honor X9a

72h

12. Wiko Power U20

71h

13. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G

70h

14. Oppo A78 5G

70h

15. Vivo Y20s

69h

16. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10

69h

17. Samsung Galaxy A13 5G

69h

18. Samsung Galaxy A72

69h

19. Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max

68h

20. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro

67h

21. Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra (Snapdragon)

67h

22. Oppo Reno8 Lite 5G

66h

23. Motorola Moto G62 5G

65h

24. Honor X7

65h

25. Samsung Galaxy A34 5G

65h

26. Oppo A54 5G

65h

27. Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max

65h

28. Samsung Galaxy A23 5G

64h

29. OnePlus Nord CE 5G

64h

30. Vivo Y76 5G

64h

31. Oppo A74

64h

32. Motorola Moto G9 Power

64h

33. Oppo A74 5G

63h

34. Apple iPhone 14 Plus

63h

35. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G

62h

36. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S

61h

37. Honor Magic4 Lite 5G

61h

38. Samsung Galaxy A54 5G

60h

39. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11

60h

40. Xiaomi 13 Pro

60h

41. Realme GT Neo 2 5G

60h

42. Xiaomi 11T

59h

43. Vivo X80 Lite 5G

59h

44. Realme C11

59h

45. Honor 70

58h

46. Oppo Find X5 Lite

58h

47. Oppo A94 5G

58h

48. Oppo Reno8 5G

58h

49. Realme C21

57h

50. Oppo Reno6 5G

57h

51. Sony Xperia 5 IV

57h

52. Xiaomi Redmi 10 2022

57h

53. Xiaomi 11T Pro

57h

54. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G

56h

55. OnePlus 10T 5G

55h

56. OnePlus Nord 2 5G

54h

57. Nothing Phone(1)

54h

58. OnePlus 9

54h

59. Xiaomi 13

54h

60. Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G

54h

61. Apple iPhone 14 Pro

54h

62. Xiaomi 12T Pro

54h

63. Apple iPhone 13 Pro

53h

64. Xiaomi 12 Lite 5G

53h

65. Nubia RedMagic 7 Pro

53h

66. Apple iPhone 14

53h

67. Apple iPhone 13

52h

68. Motorola Edge 20 Pro

52h

69. OnePlus Nord 2T 5G

52h

70. Realme GT Neo 3

52h

71. Xiaomi 12T

52h

72. Google Pixel 7 Pro

52h

73. Realme GT 5G

52h

74. Huawei P50 Pro

51h

75. Oppo Find X3 Neo

51h

76. Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro 5G

51h

77. Vivo X60 Pro 5G (Snapdragon)

51h

78. Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra

50h

79. Google Pixel 6a

50h

80. Huawei P40 Lite

50h

81. Realme GT 2 Pro

50h

82. Xiaomi Redmi 9

50h

83. Samsung Galaxy S21 5G (Snapdragon)

50h

84. Samsung Galaxy A53 5G

49h

85. Asus Zenfone 8 Flip

49h

86. Oppo Find X5 Pro

49h

87. Oppo Reno8 Pro 5G

49h

88. Google Pixel 7

49h

89. Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max

49h

90. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4

49h

91. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Snapdragon)

48h

92. Google Pixel 6

48h

93. Oppo Reno6 Pro 5G (Snapdragon)

48h

94. Oppo Find X5

48h

95. Motorola Edge 30 Pro

47h

96. Samsung Galaxy A33 5G

47h

97. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Snapdragon)

47h

98. Sony Xperia 1 IV

47h

99. Samsung Galaxy S21 5G (Exynos)

46h

100. Oppo Find X3 Lite

46h

101. Nubia RedMagic 6 Pro

46h

102. Xiaomi 12

45h

103. OnePlus 8T

45h

104. Asus Zenfone 8

45h

105. Google Pixel 5

44h

106. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos)

44h

107. Oppo Find X3 Pro

44h

108. OnePlus 10 Pro

43h

109. Vivo X80 Pro (Snapdragon)

43h

110. OnePlus 9 Pro

43h

111. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G

43h

112. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4

42h

113. Google Pixel 6 Pro

41h

114. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Exynos)

41h

115. Black Shark 5 Pro

41h

116. Apple iPhone 13 mini

41h

117. Apple iPhone 12 mini

40h

118. POCO F4 GT

40h

119. Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Exynos)

40h

120. Samsung Galaxy S22 (Snapdragon)

39h

121. Honor Magic4 Pro

39h

122. Vivo X51 5G

38h

123. Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G (Snapdragon)

38h

124. Huawei Mate 50 Pro

38h

125. Apple iPhone SE (2022)

37h

126. Xiaomi Mi 11

36h

127. Samsung Galaxy S22 (Exynos)

35h

128. Xiaomi 12 Pro

34h

Position in High-End Ranking
Battery Life (moderate)

4^th

1. Sony Xperia 10 IV

80h

2. Samsung Galaxy A72

69h

3. Oppo Reno8 Lite 5G

66h

4. Samsung Galaxy A54 5G

60h

5. Realme GT Neo 2 5G

60h

6. Xiaomi 11T

59h

7. Vivo X80 Lite 5G

59h

8. Honor 70

58h

9. Oppo Find X5 Lite

58h

10. Oppo Reno8 5G

58h

11. Oppo Reno6 5G

57h

12. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G

56h

13. Nothing Phone(1)

54h

14. Xiaomi 12 Lite 5G

53h

15. Xiaomi 12T

52h

16. Realme GT 5G

52h

17. Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro 5G

51h

18. Google Pixel 6a

50h

19. Samsung Galaxy A53 5G

49h

20. Google Pixel 7

49h

21. Google Pixel 6

48h

22. Oppo Find X3 Lite

46h

23. OnePlus 8T

45h

24. POCO F4 GT

40h

25. Apple iPhone SE (2022)

37h

Home/Office

129

Samsung Galaxy A54 5G

213

Honor X7a

Typical Usage Scenario discharge curves

On the go

130

Samsung Galaxy A54 5G

195

Samsung Galaxy M51

Autonomy for on the go use cases (full charge)

Calibrated

109

Samsung Galaxy A54 5G

198

Samsung Galaxy M51

Autonomy for calibrated use cases (full charge)

Charging

108

Samsung Galaxy A54 5G

181

Realme GT Neo 3

How Charging score is composed

Learn more about how we test battery

Wired

50%

in 30 min

0h52

0 - 80%

1h40

Full charge

103

Samsung Galaxy A54 5G

184

Black Shark 5 Pro

Position in Global Ranking
Charging Time 0-80%

82^nd

1. Black Shark 5 Pro

0h13

2. Realme GT Neo 3

0h14

3. Nubia RedMagic 6 Pro

0h14

4. OnePlus 10T 5G

0h16

5. POCO F4 GT

0h17

6. Xiaomi 11T Pro

0h18

7. Nubia RedMagic 7 Pro

0h19

8. Oppo Reno8 5G

0h21

9. Realme GT 5G

0h21

10. Xiaomi 12 Pro

0h21

11. OnePlus 9

0h21

12. Oppo Reno6 5G

0h22

13. Xiaomi 12T Pro

0h22

14. OnePlus 9 Pro

0h22

15. Honor Magic4 Pro

0h22

16. OnePlus Nord 2 5G

0h22

17. Oppo Find X5 Lite

0h22

18. OnePlus Nord 2T 5G

0h22

19. Oppo Reno6 Pro 5G (Snapdragon)

0h22

20. Oppo Reno8 Pro 5G

0h23

21. Oppo Find X3 Pro

0h23

22. Oppo Find X3 Neo

0h23

23. Xiaomi 13 Pro

0h23

24. Oppo Find X5 Pro

0h23

25. Vivo X80 Pro (Snapdragon)

0h24

26. Oppo Find X5

0h25

27. OnePlus 8T

0h25

28. Xiaomi 12T

0h25

29. Realme GT Neo 2 5G

0h25

30. Oppo Find X3 Lite

0h26

31. OnePlus 10 Pro

0h26

32. Realme GT 2 Pro

0h26

33. Xiaomi 12

0h27

34. Huawei Mate 50 Pro

0h28

35. Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra

0h28

36. Honor Magic4 Lite 5G

0h28

37. Xiaomi 13

0h29

38. Xiaomi 12 Lite 5G

0h29

39. Xiaomi 11T

0h30

40. Huawei P50 Pro

0h30

41. Xiaomi Mi 11

0h31

42. Honor 70

0h32

43. Motorola Edge 30 Pro

0h34

44. Huawei P40 Lite

0h34

45. Asus ROG Phone 6

0h35

46. Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra (Snapdragon)

0h37

47. Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Exynos)

0h37

48. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G

0h38

49. Oppo A94 5G

0h39

50. Vivo Y76 5G

0h39

51. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Snapdragon)

0h39

52. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos)

0h40

53. Vivo X60 Pro 5G (Snapdragon)

0h40

54. Vivo X51 5G

0h41

55. Vivo X80 Lite 5G

0h42

56. OnePlus Nord CE 5G

0h42

57. Motorola Edge 20 Pro

0h43

58. Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G

0h43

59. Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro 5G

0h43

60. Oppo Reno8 Lite 5G

0h44

61. Asus Zenfone 8

0h45

62. Honor Magic5 Lite 5G

0h46

63. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Snapdragon)

0h46

64. Nothing Phone(1)

0h47

65. Oppo A74

0h48

66. Samsung Galaxy S21 5G (Exynos)

0h48

67. Samsung Galaxy S21 5G (Snapdragon)

0h49

68. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11

0h49

69. Apple iPhone 13 Pro

0h49

70. Oppo A78 5G

0h49

71. Samsung Galaxy A23 5G

0h49

72. Oppo A77 5G

0h50

73. Samsung Galaxy S22 (Snapdragon)

0h50

74. Samsung Galaxy S22 (Exynos)

0h51

75. Apple iPhone SE (2022)

0h51

75. Samsung Galaxy A34 5G

0h51

77. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Exynos)

0h51

78. Apple iPhone 12 mini

0h52

79. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10

0h52

80. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S

0h52

81. Apple iPhone 14 Pro

0h52

82. Samsung Galaxy A54 5G

0h52

83. Honor X9a

0h53

84. Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G (Snapdragon)

0h53

85. Apple iPhone 14

0h54

86. Samsung Galaxy A33 5G

0h54

86. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S 5G

0h54

88. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro

0h55

89. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4

0h56

90. Samsung Galaxy A53 5G

0h57

91. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4

0h57

92. Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max

0h57

93. Apple iPhone 13 mini

0h57

94. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G

0h57

95. Samsung Galaxy A72

0h58

96. Apple iPhone 13

0h58

97. Google Pixel 7

1h00

98. Asus Zenfone 8 Flip

1h01

99. Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max

1h01

100. Honor X8 5G

1h02

101. Google Pixel 6 Pro

1h02

102. Google Pixel 6

1h03

102. Apple iPhone 14 Plus

1h03

104. Google Pixel 7 Pro

1h03

105. Honor X7

1h05

106. Sony Xperia 1 IV

1h05

107. Sony Xperia 5 IV

1h05

108. Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max

1h06

109. Honor X7a

1h10

110. Google Pixel 6a

1h11

111. Google Pixel 5

1h14

112. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G

1h15

113. Vivo Y72 5G

1h18

114. Oppo A74 5G

1h21

115. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G

1h22

116. Samsung Galaxy M51

1h23

117. Xiaomi Redmi 10 2022

1h25

118. Vivo Y20s

1h25

119. Motorola Moto G62 5G

1h26

120. Samsung Galaxy A13 5G

1h30

121. Sony Xperia 10 IV

1h45

122. Wiko Power U30

1h47

123. Realme C21

1h50

124. Oppo A54 5G

1h51

125. Xiaomi Redmi 9

1h52

126. Motorola Moto G9 Power

1h53

127. Realme C11

1h56

128. Wiko Power U20

2h22

Position in High-End Ranking
Charging Time 0-80%

18^th

1. POCO F4 GT

0h17

2. Oppo Reno8 5G

0h21

3. Realme GT 5G

0h21

4. Oppo Reno6 5G

0h22

5. Oppo Find X5 Lite

0h22

6. OnePlus 8T

0h25

7. Xiaomi 12T

0h25

8. Realme GT Neo 2 5G

0h25

9. Oppo Find X3 Lite

0h26

10. Xiaomi 12 Lite 5G

0h29

11. Xiaomi 11T

0h30

12. Honor 70

0h32

13. Vivo X80 Lite 5G

0h42

14. Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro 5G

0h43

15. Oppo Reno8 Lite 5G

0h44

16. Nothing Phone(1)

0h47

17. Apple iPhone SE (2022)

0h51

18. Samsung Galaxy A54 5G

0h52

19. Samsung Galaxy A53 5G

0h57

20. Samsung Galaxy A72

0h58

21. Google Pixel 7

1h00

22. Google Pixel 6

1h03

23. Google Pixel 6a

1h11

24. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G

1h15

25. Sony Xperia 10 IV

1h45

Power consumption and battery level during full charge

Time to full charge

The time to full charge chart breaks down the necessary time to reach 80%, 100% and full charge.

Quick boost

114

Samsung Galaxy A54 5G

182

Realme GT Neo 3

Average autonomy gain for a 5 minute charge (wired)

Efficiency

Samsung Galaxy A54 5G

154

Oppo Reno6 5G

How Efficiency score is composed

Learn more about how we test battery

Annual Consumption Samsung Galaxy A54 5G

4 kWh

Efficient

Good

Bad

Inefficient

Charge up

112

Samsung Galaxy A54 5G

205

Nubia RedMagic 7 Pro

Overall charge efficiency

Discharge

Samsung Galaxy A54 5G

194

Apple iPhone 14 Pro

Average discharge current

The post Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Battery appeared first on DXOMARK.